Alabama A&M

18-15

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

39.9%Alabama A&M

60.1%Grambling

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADGrambling -4.2

PROJECTED TOTAL142.8

MODEL MONEYLINEGrambling -151

Grambling

14-19

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreAlabama A&M 69

Projected Total142.8

Projected ScoreGrambling 74

Team Comparison

Alabama A&MMetricGrambling

42.3MMH Power Index41.4

105.9Offensive Efficiency100.7

106.6Defensive Efficiency100.4

-0.7Net Efficiency0.3

-6.8Strength of Schedule-5.7

3.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.4

68.0Tempo69.9

49.7%Effective FG%49.2%

16.8%Turnover Rate20.9%

28.0%Offensive Rebound %30.4%

45.7%Free Throw Rate42.2%

-0.5Average Margin0.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Alabama A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY60.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAlabama A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (42.3–41.4), offensive efficiency (105.9–100.7), recent form (3.3–-0.4), shooting efficiency (49.7–49.2).

Grambling COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (100.4–106.6), net efficiency (0.3–-0.7), strength of schedule (-5.7–-6.8).

Final

Alabama A&M

51—67

Grambling

Grambling by 16 • 61.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Alabama A&MTEAM STATGrambling

17-52FG26-47

33.0%FG%55.0%

6-223PT4-10

27.0%3PT%40.0%

11-16FT11-13

69.0%FT%85.0%

23Rebounds26

10Offensive Rebounds4

7Assists12

14Turnovers11

5Steals8

3Blocks5

15Fouls17

Player Box Score

Alabama A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Dylan Mclean	Guard	29	2-6	1-3	5-6	3	0	1	0	10
Saliou Seye	F	20	4-5	2-2	0-0	4	1	0	0	10
AC Bryant	G	29	4-12	0-4	1-2	1	2	0	0	9
Chad Moodie	F	27	4-11	0-0	0-0	6	0	1	3	8
Quincy McGriff	Guard	12	2-4	2-3	0-0	0	0	0	0	6
London Riley	Guard	14	1-6	1-5	0-0	0	1	0	0	3
Aaron Smith	Guard	5	0-0	0-0	2-2	1	0	0	0	2
Clance Crosby	F	12	0-0	0-0	1-2	5	2	0	0	1
Angok Anyang	F	10	0-0	0-0	1-2	2	0	1	0	1
Darius Ford	Guard	5	0-1	0-1	1-2	0	0	0	0	1
Lorenzo Downey	Guard	16	0-3	0-1	0-0	0	0	2	0	0
Jaylen Colon	Guard	15	0-3	0-3	0-0	1	1	0	0	0
Bilal Abdur-Rahman	G	4	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Ademola Oladipo	Forward	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Warren Yeh	Guard	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Grambling

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
James Flippin	F	29	8-10	0-2	2-2	2	3	0	0	18
Kintavious Dozier	G	29	3-8	1-3	4-5	2	3	1	0	11
Lou Hutchinson	G	14	3-7	2-3	1-2	3	0	0	1	9
PJ Eason	F	31	4-4	0-0	0-0	7	1	2	2	8
Mikale Stevenson	G	20	2-3	0-0	2-2	2	2	1	0	6
Antwan Burnett	G	20	3-4	0-0	0-0	2	1	1	0	6
Cbo Newton	G	21	2-5	1-2	0-0	4	1	2	2	5
Ernest Ross	Forward	11	1-1	0-0	2-2	1	0	0	0	4
P.J. Edwards	G	25	0-5	0-0	0-0	3	1	1	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

61.9Possessions61.9

82.4Offensive Efficiency108.2

108.2Defensive Efficiency82.4

-25.8Net Efficiency25.8

38.5%Effective FG%59.6%

42.8%True Shooting %63.0%

22.0%Turnover Rate18.3%

30.8%Free Throw Rate27.7%

42.3%3-Point Rate21.3%

0.50Assist / Turnover1.09

Game Summary

Grambling won by 16 points. The game played at approximately 61.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.