North Carolina A&T

11-19

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

7.9%North Carolina A&T

92.1%Hofstra

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADHofstra -17.1

PROJECTED TOTAL149.0

MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -1166

Hofstra

24-11

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreNorth Carolina A&T 66

Projected Total149.0

Projected ScoreHofstra 83

Team Comparison

North Carolina A&TMetricHofstra

41.8MMH Power Index59.3

107.4Offensive Efficiency114.0

111.4Defensive Efficiency100.9

-4.0Net Efficiency13.1

-1.5Strength of Schedule-2.9

-11.2Last 10 Net Efficiency14.0

69.9Tempo66.2

51.5%Effective FG%52.2%

18.4%Turnover Rate16.1%

31.7%Offensive Rebound %35.0%

46.7%Free Throw Rate32.0%

-2.8Average Margin8.7

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Hofstra HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY92.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–41.8), offensive efficiency (114.0–107.4), defensive efficiency (100.9–111.4), net efficiency (13.1–-4.0).

North Carolina A&T COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.5–-2.9), free throw rate (46.7–32.0).

Final

North Carolina A&T

55—77

Hofstra

Hofstra by 22 • 64.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

North Carolina A&TTEAM STATHofstra

16-51FG26-63

31.0%FG%41.0%

5-223PT15-36

23.0%3PT%42.0%

18-23FT10-17

78.0%FT%59.0%

38Rebounds40

10Offensive Rebounds11

6Assists19

12Turnovers5

3Steals10

2Blocks2

14Fouls19

Player Box Score

North Carolina A&T

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jahnathan Lamothe	G	40	8-27	2-13	3-3	4	2	0	0	21
Efstratios Kalliontzis	C	33	3-4	0-0	7-9	9	0	0	0	13
Jalal McKie	G	34	2-10	2-4	1-2	2	1	1	0	7
Bryson Ogletree	G	39	1-5	0-4	4-4	3	2	1	0	6
Nikolaos Chitikoudis	F	34	1-4	0-0	2-3	10	1	1	1	4
Jordan Martin	G	9	1-1	1-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	3
Jason Murphy	Center	11	0-0	0-0	1-2	5	0	0	1	1

Hofstra

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
German Plotnikov	G	33	8-14	7-11	0-0	10	1	3	1	23
Cruz Davis	G	31	6-13	3-8	4-7	4	8	2	0	19
TJ Gadsden	Guard	13	3-6	1-3	1-1	5	0	0	0	8
Jean Aranguren	G	23	2-9	1-6	1-2	2	5	1	0	6
Michael Graham	Forward	21	3-5	0-0	0-0	6	0	0	0	6
KiJan Robinson	G	9	1-5	1-2	2-3	1	1	0	0	5
Silas Sunday	F	11	1-3	0-0	2-4	3	0	0	0	4
Eric Parnell	G	29	1-2	1-2	0-0	4	4	3	0	3
Khalil Farmer	G	20	1-3	1-2	0-0	2	0	1	0	3
Joshua DeCady	F	9	0-3	0-2	0-0	1	0	0	1	0
Jayden Henriquez	Guard	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

64.5Possessions64.5

85.3Offensive Efficiency119.4

119.4Defensive Efficiency85.3

-34.1Net Efficiency34.1

36.3%Effective FG%53.2%

44.4%True Shooting %54.2%

18.8%Turnover Rate7.7%

45.1%Free Throw Rate27.0%

43.1%3-Point Rate57.1%

0.50Assist / Turnover3.80

Game Summary

Hofstra won by 22 points. The game played at approximately 64.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.