Binghamton logo

Binghamton

8-22
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
17.3%Binghamton
82.7%UAlbany
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUAlbany -11.2
PROJECTED TOTAL137.7
MODEL MONEYLINEUAlbany -478
UAlbany logo

UAlbany

11-20
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBinghamton 63
Projected Total137.7
Projected ScoreUAlbany 74

Team Comparison

32.4MMH Power Index41.9
102.2Offensive Efficiency107.9
112.3Defensive Efficiency108.8
-10.1Net Efficiency-0.9
-6.0Strength of Schedule-6.1
-6.2Last 10 Net Efficiency0.0
64.2Tempo64.3
51.3%Effective FG%52.8%
18.5%Turnover Rate18.6%
21.5%Offensive Rebound %34.3%
42.8%Free Throw Rate25.0%
-6.5Average Margin-0.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UAlbany HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY82.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAlbany holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (41.9–32.4), offensive efficiency (107.9–102.2), defensive efficiency (108.8–112.3), net efficiency (-0.9–-10.1).
Binghamton COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-6.0–-6.1), ball security (18.5–18.6), free throw rate (42.8–25.0).
Final
Binghamton logo
Binghamton
66—69
UAlbany logo
UAlbany
UAlbany by 3 • 64.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

BinghamtonTEAM STATUAlbany
25-57FG26-69
44.0%FG%38.0%
7-203PT10-32
35.0%3PT%31.0%
9-13FT7-9
69.0%FT%78.0%
31Rebounds42
5Offensive Rebounds16
11Assists11
6Turnovers8
5Steals5
7Blocks9
13Fouls14

Player Box Score

Binghamton
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Nehemiah BensonForward337-70-05-510020019
Tymu CheneryGuard366-111-21-263010014
Wes Peterson Jr.G383-62-30-25201008
Chris WalkerG323-91-31-22011008
Ben Callahan-GoldForward172-82-80-01022006
Evan AsheG172-60-22-22220006
Gavin WalshF272-101-20-09400005
UAlbany
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Amar'e MarshallG357-144-82-221110020
Byron JoshuaGuard326-132-72-341200016
Amir LindseyG223-72-61-26310009
Kheni BriggsG83-92-51-14110009
DeMarr Langford Jr.Not Available363-80-00-011204006
Justin NeelyF232-70-21-16100005
Kacper KlaczekF382-80-40-04204004
Bautista GiraltC60-30-00-03000000

Advanced Game Stats

64.8Possessions64.8
101.9Offensive Efficiency106.5
106.5Defensive Efficiency101.9
-4.6Net Efficiency4.6
50.0%Effective FG%44.9%
52.2%True Shooting %47.1%
9.3%Turnover Rate12.3%
22.8%Free Throw Rate13.0%
35.1%3-Point Rate46.4%
1.83Assist / Turnover1.38
Game Summary
UAlbany won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 64.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.