North Alabama

9-21

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

12.4%North Alabama

87.6%Lipscomb

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADLipscomb -14.3

PROJECTED TOTAL150.6

MODEL MONEYLINELipscomb -706

Lipscomb

18-13

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreNorth Alabama 68

Projected Total150.6

Projected ScoreLipscomb 82

Team Comparison

North AlabamaMetricLipscomb

34.9MMH Power Index47.9

104.4Offensive Efficiency111.3

116.7Defensive Efficiency107.6

-12.3Net Efficiency3.7

-1.2Strength of Schedule-2.5

-16.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.0

66.5Tempo68.8

48.9%Effective FG%54.8%

17.2%Turnover Rate16.0%

31.5%Offensive Rebound %25.9%

39.1%Free Throw Rate26.5%

-8.2Average Margin2.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Lipscomb HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY87.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLipscomb holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.9–34.9), offensive efficiency (111.3–104.4), defensive efficiency (107.6–116.7), net efficiency (3.7–-12.3).

North Alabama COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.2–-2.5), offensive rebounding (31.5–25.9), free throw rate (39.1–26.5).

Final

North Alabama

65—76

Lipscomb

Lipscomb by 11 • 65.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

North AlabamaTEAM STATLipscomb

23-67FG19-47

34.0%FG%40.0%

4-173PT12-27

24.0%3PT%44.0%

15-24FT26-30

63.0%FT%87.0%

42Rebounds36

18Offensive Rebounds6

7Assists8

7Turnovers9

6Steals4

1Blocks8

20Fouls17

Player Box Score

North Alabama

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jacari Lane	G	40	7-21	2-8	2-3	6	1	0	0	18
Corneilous Williams	F	25	6-7	0-0	3-4	7	0	1	0	15
Will Soucie	Guard	37	3-12	0-1	4-6	6	0	1	0	10
Donte Bacchus	F	23	3-11	0-1	2-5	3	0	1	0	8
Taye Fields	Guard	37	1-7	0-0	4-6	12	6	1	1	6
Canin Jefferson	G	15	2-4	1-3	0-0	1	0	2	0	5
Daniel Ortiz	Guard	23	1-5	1-4	0-0	2	0	0	0	3

Lipscomb

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Joe Anderson	Guard	40	6-9	4-7	7-8	5	4	2	3	23
Will Pruitt	Guard	38	3-10	1-4	10-10	7	3	0	2	17
Gyasi Powell	Guard	35	5-9	4-6	2-2	3	1	2	0	16
Jacob Ognacevic	F	40	3-12	1-4	7-8	9	0	0	1	14
Charlie Williams	C	20	1-4	1-3	0-0	7	0	0	2	3
Miles White	G	9	1-2	1-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Grant Asman	F	18	0-1	0-1	0-2	3	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

65.9Possessions65.9

98.6Offensive Efficiency115.3

115.3Defensive Efficiency98.6

-16.7Net Efficiency16.7

37.3%Effective FG%53.2%

41.5%True Shooting %62.0%

10.4%Turnover Rate14.0%

35.8%Free Throw Rate63.8%

25.4%3-Point Rate57.4%

1.00Assist / Turnover0.89

Game Summary

Lipscomb won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 65.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.