UAB

20-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

71.0%UAB

29.0%Tulane

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUAB -5.4

PROJECTED TOTAL152.6

MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -245

Tulane

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUAB 79

Projected Total152.6

Projected ScoreTulane 74

Team Comparison

UABMetricTulane

56.9MMH Power Index44.3

110.5Offensive Efficiency105.3

102.9Defensive Efficiency109.9

7.6Net Efficiency-4.6

0.4Strength of Schedule2.7

2.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.3

71.7Tempo68.7

48.8%Effective FG%49.6%

12.4%Turnover Rate15.6%

32.7%Offensive Rebound %22.8%

36.9%Free Throw Rate44.8%

5.4Average Margin-3.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UAB HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY71.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.9–44.3), offensive efficiency (110.5–105.3), defensive efficiency (102.9–109.9), net efficiency (7.6–-4.6).

Tulane COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.7–0.4), shooting efficiency (49.6–48.8), free throw rate (44.8–36.9).

Final

UAB

68—85

Tulane

Tulane by 17 • 64.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UABTEAM STATTulane

25-58FG34-63

43.0%FG%54.0%

10-253PT13-27

40.0%3PT%48.0%

8-12FT4-6

67.0%FT%67.0%

33Rebounds30

11Offensive Rebounds8

11Assists22

12Turnovers7

1Steals7

9Blocks8

9Fouls11

Player Box Score

UAB

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Ja'Borri McGhee	G	37	10-17	3-8	2-4	2	1	1	0	25
Tyren Moore	G	22	5-7	4-5	0-0	2	4	0	0	14
Yaxel Lendeborg	F	34	3-5	1-2	6-6	5	1	0	3	13
Christian Coleman	G	26	3-11	0-0	0-2	7	1	0	1	6
Tony Toney	Guard	30	1-4	1-4	0-0	4	2	0	1	3
Butta Johnson	G	16	1-4	1-3	0-0	1	1	0	2	3
Bradley Ezewiro	Forward	14	1-4	0-1	0-0	3	0	0	1	2
Makhi Myles	F	4	1-2	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	1	2
Alejandro Vasquez	Guard	17	0-4	0-2	0-0	3	1	0	0	0

Tulane

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kam Williams	G	39	9-12	6-8	0-0	3	1	2	2	24
Asher Woods	G	39	8-10	3-4	1-2	3	5	0	0	20
Kaleb Banks	F	34	5-13	2-8	1-2	5	1	1	3	13
Rowan Brumbaugh	G	36	5-13	1-4	0-0	5	11	3	0	11
Gregg Glenn III	F	32	5-11	0-1	0-0	7	4	1	2	10
Mari Jordan	G	7	2-2	1-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	5
Percy Daniels	C	8	0-0	0-0	2-2	1	0	0	1	2
Tyler Ringgold	F	3	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Joseph Teich	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Jake Shapiro	G	1	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

64.8Possessions64.8

104.9Offensive Efficiency131.2

131.2Defensive Efficiency104.9

-26.2Net Efficiency26.2

51.7%Effective FG%64.3%

53.4%True Shooting %64.5%

18.5%Turnover Rate10.8%

20.7%Free Throw Rate9.5%

43.1%3-Point Rate42.9%

0.92Assist / Turnover3.14

Game Summary

Tulane won by 17 points. The game played at approximately 64.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.