Pittsburgh

13-20

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

39.7%Pittsburgh

60.3%Notre Dame

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADNotre Dame -3.7

PROJECTED TOTAL147.5

MODEL MONEYLINENotre Dame -152

Notre Dame

13-17

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScorePittsburgh 72

Projected Total147.5

Projected ScoreNotre Dame 76

Team Comparison

PittsburghMetricNotre Dame

50.5MMH Power Index49.7

108.4Offensive Efficiency110.3

110.4Defensive Efficiency111.2

-2.0Net Efficiency-0.9

5.5Strength of Schedule4.7

-6.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-11.6

65.0Tempo68.0

51.4%Effective FG%53.0%

17.3%Turnover Rate17.0%

33.1%Offensive Rebound %31.4%

31.2%Free Throw Rate34.7%

-1.3Average Margin-0.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Notre Dame HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY60.3%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNotre Dame holds the advantage in offensive efficiency (110.3–108.4), net efficiency (-0.9–-2.0), shooting efficiency (53.0–51.4), ball security (17.0–17.3).

Pittsburgh COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (50.5–49.7), defensive efficiency (110.4–111.2), strength of schedule (5.5–4.7).

Final

Pittsburgh

54—55

Notre Dame

Notre Dame by 1 • 64.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

PittsburghTEAM STATNotre Dame

21-58FG21-53

36.0%FG%40.0%

4-223PT4-20

18.0%3PT%20.0%

8-9FT9-10

89.0%FT%90.0%

31Rebounds37

10Offensive Rebounds10

10Assists9

11Turnovers17

9Steals8

1Blocks2

12Fouls12

Player Box Score

Pittsburgh

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jaland Lowe	G	40	6-18	1-5	4-4	2	4	2	0	17
Cameron Corhen	F	26	5-7	0-0	0-1	4	1	0	0	10
Brandin Cummings	G	31	2-8	1-5	4-4	1	1	1	0	9
Zack Austin	Forward	36	3-8	2-5	0-0	4	1	1	0	8
Ishmael Leggett	Guard	37	2-9	0-3	0-0	7	1	3	1	4
Guillermo Diaz Graham	F	14	2-3	0-0	0-0	5	1	1	0	4
Jorge Diaz Graham	F	7	1-3	0-2	0-0	2	1	0	0	2
Amsal Delalic	G	9	0-2	0-2	0-0	1	0	1	0	0

Notre Dame

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tae Davis	F	34	3-10	0-3	5-6	5	1	1	0	11
Markus Burton	G	34	4-14	0-3	2-2	5	3	4	0	10
Nikita Konstantynovskyi	Forward	26	4-4	0-0	2-2	9	1	0	1	10
Matt Allocco	Guard	35	3-6	3-6	0-0	5	1	0	0	9
Julian Roper II	Guard	30	4-10	0-3	0-0	2	1	2	1	8
Sir Mohammed	G	9	2-3	0-0	0-0	1	0	1	0	4
Cole Certa	G	13	1-5	1-4	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
J.R. Konieczny	F	15	0-0	0-0	0-0	3	2	0	0	0
Garrett Sundra	F	3	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Logan Imes	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

64.1Possessions64.1

84.2Offensive Efficiency85.8

85.8Defensive Efficiency84.2

-1.6Net Efficiency1.6

39.7%Effective FG%43.4%

43.4%True Shooting %47.6%

17.4%Turnover Rate26.3%

15.5%Free Throw Rate18.9%

37.9%3-Point Rate37.7%

0.91Assist / Turnover0.53

Game Summary

Notre Dame won by 1 points. The game played at approximately 64.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Turnover Rate, True Shooting %, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.