
Sam Houston
22-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
68.9%Sam Houston
31.1%UTEP
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSam Houston -5.1
PROJECTED TOTAL151.3
MODEL MONEYLINESam Houston -222

UTEP
11-20MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSam Houston 78
Projected Total151.3
Projected ScoreUTEP 73
Team Comparison
56.1MMH Power Index44.4
115.5Offensive Efficiency102.6
105.5Defensive Efficiency107.1
10.0Net Efficiency-4.5
-2.2Strength of Schedule1.7
3.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7
71.2Tempo67.6
53.2%Effective FG%49.2%
16.6%Turnover Rate17.3%
37.4%Offensive Rebound %27.6%
34.8%Free Throw Rate35.6%
7.1Average Margin-3.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Sam Houston HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY68.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSam Houston holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.1–44.4), offensive efficiency (115.5–102.6), defensive efficiency (105.5–107.1), net efficiency (10.0–-4.5).
UTEP COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.7–-2.2), free throw rate (35.6–34.8).