Sam Houston logo

Sam Houston

22-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
68.9%Sam Houston
31.1%UTEP
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSam Houston -5.1
PROJECTED TOTAL151.3
MODEL MONEYLINESam Houston -222
UTEP logo

UTEP

11-20
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreSam Houston 78
Projected Total151.3
Projected ScoreUTEP 73

Team Comparison

56.1MMH Power Index44.4
115.5Offensive Efficiency102.6
105.5Defensive Efficiency107.1
10.0Net Efficiency-4.5
-2.2Strength of Schedule1.7
3.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7
71.2Tempo67.6
53.2%Effective FG%49.2%
16.6%Turnover Rate17.3%
37.4%Offensive Rebound %27.6%
34.8%Free Throw Rate35.6%
7.1Average Margin-3.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Sam Houston HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY68.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSam Houston holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.1–44.4), offensive efficiency (115.5–102.6), defensive efficiency (105.5–107.1), net efficiency (10.0–-4.5).
UTEP COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.7–-2.2), free throw rate (35.6–34.8).
Final
Sam Houston logo
Sam Houston
65—79
UTEP logo
UTEP
UTEP by 14 • 66.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Sam HoustonTEAM STATUTEP
20-50FG27-60
40.0%FG%45.0%
2-193PT12-25
11.0%3PT%48.0%
23-31FT13-17
74.0%FT%76.0%
34Rebounds35
10Offensive Rebounds11
10Assists16
13Turnovers9
6Steals10
4Blocks1
16Fouls19

Player Box Score

Sam Houston
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Lamar WilkersonG396-161-89-1163400022
Kalifa SakhoF328-80-02-581020018
Marcus BoykinGuard354-140-37-933020015
Cameron HuefnerForward331-80-43-49110005
Brennen BurnsGuard141-21-20-01100003
Josiah HammonsG350-20-22-22110002
Cheikh NdiayeF70-00-00-02000000
Jaxson FordF50-00-00-00000000
UTEP
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Corey Camper Jr.G405-114-64-431100018
Kevin KaluForward315-110-05-6151100015
Otis Frazier IIIForward334-82-52-345210012
Devon BarnesG304-112-52-312300012
David Terrell Jr.G383-91-30-02730007
Trey Horton IIIG72-42-40-01000006
Elijah JonesF92-31-10-04000005
Baylor HebbGuard102-30-10-00000004
KJ ThomasG20-00-00-11000000

Advanced Game Stats

66.9Possessions66.9
97.2Offensive Efficiency118.1
118.1Defensive Efficiency97.2
-20.9Net Efficiency20.9
42.0%Effective FG%55.0%
50.2%True Shooting %58.0%
19.2%Turnover Rate13.6%
62.0%Free Throw Rate28.3%
38.0%3-Point Rate41.7%
0.77Assist / Turnover1.78
Game Summary
UTEP won by 14 points. The game played at approximately 66.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.