Rider logo

Rider

4-25
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
5.0%Rider
95.0%Quinnipiac
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADQuinnipiac -20.6
PROJECTED TOTAL143.8
MODEL MONEYLINEQuinnipiac -1900
Quinnipiac logo

Quinnipiac

19-13
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreRider 62
Projected Total143.8
Projected ScoreQuinnipiac 82

Team Comparison

29.1MMH Power Index51
96.3Offensive Efficiency106.8
115.3Defensive Efficiency102.1
-19.0Net Efficiency4.7
-0.9Strength of Schedule-2.3
-17.7Last 10 Net Efficiency2.2
65.9Tempo70.5
43.4%Effective FG%48.9%
17.1%Turnover Rate15.6%
32.8%Offensive Rebound %34.1%
31.5%Free Throw Rate34.1%
-12.6Average Margin3.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Quinnipiac HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY95.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQuinnipiac holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.0–29.1), offensive efficiency (106.8–96.3), defensive efficiency (102.1–115.3), net efficiency (4.7–-19.0).
Rider COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-0.9–-2.3).
Final
Rider logo
Rider
64—78
Quinnipiac logo
Quinnipiac
Quinnipiac by 14 • 60.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

RiderTEAM STATQuinnipiac
27-59FG27-59
46.0%FG%46.0%
3-133PT5-21
23.0%3PT%24.0%
7-11FT19-25
64.0%FT%76.0%
32Rebounds39
13Offensive Rebounds17
15Assists13
9Turnovers7
4Steals4
3Blocks2
19Fouls13

Player Box Score

Rider
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
T.J. Weeks Jr.Guard389-173-82-291210023
Tariq IngrahamF328-90-02-481010018
Flash BurtonG334-110-12-233110010
Cole McCabeF83-30-01-21000007
Ruben Rodriguez Jr.G282-80-10-01700004
Stephen ByardF161-40-00-02110002
Zion CruzG270-60-20-01000000
Ife West-IngramF80-00-00-01100000
Jay AlvarezForward80-10-10-12100000
Zocko Littleton Jr.Guard20-00-00-00000000
Quinnipiac
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Amarri MonroeF357-152-57-881000023
Savion LewisGuard286-80-02-424300014
Khaden BennettG255-103-50-060000013
Paul OtienoF304-50-02-294000010
Alexis ReyesForward291-80-66-69212008
Jaden ZimmermanG263-90-32-51000008
Ryan MabreyG111-20-10-00200002
Richie SpringsForward90-10-00-01000000
Grant RandallF60-10-10-01000000
Quinn GuthGuard10-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

60.6Possessions60.6
105.6Offensive Efficiency128.7
128.7Defensive Efficiency105.6
-23.1Net Efficiency23.1
48.3%Effective FG%50.0%
49.8%True Shooting %55.0%
14.9%Turnover Rate11.5%
18.6%Free Throw Rate42.4%
22.0%3-Point Rate35.6%
1.67Assist / Turnover1.86
Game Summary
Quinnipiac won by 14 points. The game played at approximately 60.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.