Air Force logo

Air Force

3-29
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
2.1%Air Force
97.9%UNLV
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUNLV -25.7
PROJECTED TOTAL151.2
MODEL MONEYLINEUNLV -4662
UNLV logo

UNLV

18-16
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreAir Force 63
Projected Total151.2
Projected ScoreUNLV 88

Team Comparison

23MMH Power Index52.8
91.3Offensive Efficiency111.0
118.5Defensive Efficiency109.6
-27.2Net Efficiency1.4
6.2Strength of Schedule2.7
-33.5Last 10 Net Efficiency1.1
67.4Tempo71.4
49.0%Effective FG%53.7%
21.9%Turnover Rate17.2%
21.4%Offensive Rebound %30.8%
35.9%Free Throw Rate41.6%
-18.3Average Margin1.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UNLV HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY97.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUNLV holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.8–23.0), offensive efficiency (111.0–91.3), defensive efficiency (109.6–118.5), net efficiency (1.4–-27.2).
Air Force COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (6.2–2.7).
Final
Air Force logo
Air Force
59—68
UNLV logo
UNLV
UNLV by 9 • 65.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Air ForceTEAM STATUNLV
20-57FG23-51
35.0%FG%45.0%
11-383PT6-21
29.0%3PT%29.0%
8-9FT16-26
89.0%FT%62.0%
32Rebounds40
4Offensive Rebounds7
17Assists19
8Turnovers10
10Steals4
4Blocks4
20Fouls12

Player Box Score

Air Force
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Ethan TaylorGuard378-167-140-063200023
Caleb WalkerF144-60-21-11001009
Luke KearneyF303-82-60-02111008
Wesley CelichowskiC152-41-23-43110008
Will CooperF281-60-52-24102004
Kyle MarshallG261-40-22-25120004
Beau BeckerForward111-71-50-02310003
Jeffrey MillsGuard300-40-20-02530000
Chase BeasleyGuard90-20-00-02200000
UNLV
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jalen HillForward405-100-18-13107210018
Jeremiah CherryF334-80-05-950020013
Jailen BedfordG285-83-50-093100013
Jaden HenleyG384-151-93-464100012
Pape N'DiayeF72-20-00-02001004
Isaiah CottrellF241-31-30-03200003
DeMarion YapGuard51-11-10-00000003
Brooklyn HicksG251-40-20-04300002

Advanced Game Stats

65.9Possessions65.9
89.5Offensive Efficiency103.2
103.2Defensive Efficiency89.5
-13.7Net Efficiency13.7
44.7%Effective FG%51.0%
48.1%True Shooting %53.7%
12.3%Turnover Rate15.1%
15.8%Free Throw Rate51.0%
66.7%3-Point Rate41.2%
2.13Assist / Turnover1.90
Game Summary
UNLV won by 9 points. The game played at approximately 65.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.