
Tulsa
30-8GAME THAT MATTERSAT
73.9%Tulsa
26.1%Temple
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTulsa -6.2
PROJECTED TOTAL154.0
MODEL MONEYLINETulsa -283

Temple
16-16MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTulsa 80
Projected Total154.0
Projected ScoreTemple 74
Team Comparison
64.8MMH Power Index50.9
121.1Offensive Efficiency112.2
104.8Defensive Efficiency107.4
16.3Net Efficiency4.8
0.0Strength of Schedule-2.0
10.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.5
70.2Tempo65.9
55.4%Effective FG%51.1%
15.4%Turnover Rate13.7%
33.8%Offensive Rebound %28.8%
42.4%Free Throw Rate42.3%
11.5Average Margin3.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Tulsa HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY73.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTulsa holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.8–50.9), offensive efficiency (121.1–112.2), defensive efficiency (104.8–107.4), net efficiency (16.3–4.8).
Temple COUNTERS WITHball security (13.7–15.4).