Tulsa logo

Tulsa

30-8
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
73.9%Tulsa
26.1%Temple
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTulsa -6.2
PROJECTED TOTAL154.0
MODEL MONEYLINETulsa -283
Temple logo

Temple

16-16
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTulsa 80
Projected Total154.0
Projected ScoreTemple 74

Team Comparison

64.8MMH Power Index50.9
121.1Offensive Efficiency112.2
104.8Defensive Efficiency107.4
16.3Net Efficiency4.8
0.0Strength of Schedule-2.0
10.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.5
70.2Tempo65.9
55.4%Effective FG%51.1%
15.4%Turnover Rate13.7%
33.8%Offensive Rebound %28.8%
42.4%Free Throw Rate42.3%
11.5Average Margin3.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Tulsa HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY73.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTulsa holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.8–50.9), offensive efficiency (121.1–112.2), defensive efficiency (104.8–107.4), net efficiency (16.3–4.8).
Temple COUNTERS WITHball security (13.7–15.4).
Final
Tulsa logo
Tulsa
75—71
Temple logo
Temple
Tulsa by 4 • 70.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

TulsaTEAM STATTemple
26-55FG21-55
47.0%FG%38.0%
4-163PT6-23
25.0%3PT%26.0%
19-25FT23-34
76.0%FT%68.0%
34Rebounds34
5Offensive Rebounds10
15Assists12
9Turnovers8
5Steals6
3Blocks4
21Fouls19

Player Box Score

Tulsa
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jared GarciaF197-103-53-451110020
Dwon OdomGuard325-100-14-428000014
Keaston WillisGuard293-91-54-532100011
Tyshawn ArchieG203-70-23-42210009
Ian SmikleF213-60-01-27000007
Justin AmadiF153-50-00-21000006
Braeden CarringtonG290-40-24-46211004
Isaiah BarnesG272-40-10-03000004
Jesaiah McWrightG80-00-00-03011000
Temple
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Steve Settle IIIForward366-122-58-1062300022
Zion StanfordG396-171-34-675120017
Shane DezonieGuard273-41-23-650010010
Elijah GrayF292-100-45-73221009
Aiden TobiasonG241-11-12-33100005
Matteo PicarelliNot Available311-91-81-22100004
Babatunde DurodolaF92-20-00-04100004
Dillon BattieF30-00-00-00000000
Mohamed KeitaC20-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

70.1Possessions70.1
107.0Offensive Efficiency101.3
101.3Defensive Efficiency107.0
5.7Net Efficiency-5.7
50.9%Effective FG%43.6%
56.1%True Shooting %49.9%
12.7%Turnover Rate11.6%
45.5%Free Throw Rate61.8%
29.1%3-Point Rate41.8%
1.67Assist / Turnover1.50
Game Summary
Tulsa won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 70.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.