Florida Atlantic

18-15

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

57.5%Florida Atlantic

42.5%Tulane

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADFlorida Atlantic -2.2

PROJECTED TOTAL152.5

MODEL MONEYLINEFlorida Atlantic -135

Tulane

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreFlorida Atlantic 77

Projected Total152.5

Projected ScoreTulane 75

Team Comparison

Florida AtlanticMetricTulane

51.6MMH Power Index44.3

110.5Offensive Efficiency105.3

104.4Defensive Efficiency109.9

6.1Net Efficiency-4.6

-0.9Strength of Schedule2.7

-2.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.3

71.2Tempo68.7

52.5%Effective FG%49.6%

17.3%Turnover Rate15.6%

32.9%Offensive Rebound %22.8%

33.9%Free Throw Rate44.8%

4.3Average Margin-3.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Florida Atlantic HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY57.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMFlorida Atlantic holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.6–44.3), offensive efficiency (110.5–105.3), defensive efficiency (104.4–109.9), net efficiency (6.1–-4.6).

Tulane COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.7–-0.9), ball security (15.6–17.3), free throw rate (44.8–33.9).

Final

Florida Atlantic

76—83

Tulane

Tulane by 7 • 64.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Florida AtlanticTEAM STATTulane

25-69FG26-54

36.0%FG%48.0%

9-333PT6-13

27.0%3PT%46.0%

17-24FT25-32

71.0%FT%78.0%

42Rebounds38

19Offensive Rebounds10

16Assists18

4Turnovers5

1Steals3

5Blocks3

22Fouls20

Player Box Score

Florida Atlantic

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Matas Vokietaitis	C	29	9-11	0-0	3-6	12	0	0	1	21
Devin Vanterpool	G	16	3-4	2-3	4-4	5	0	0	0	12
Leland Walker	G	27	3-13	2-7	0-0	2	7	0	1	8
Baba Miller	F	26	1-6	0-3	6-8	7	2	0	2	8
KyKy Tandy	Guard	16	3-8	1-5	1-1	2	2	0	0	8
Kaleb Glenn	F	26	2-8	2-4	1-2	3	0	0	0	7
Tre Carroll	F	19	2-7	1-3	2-2	3	3	0	1	7
Ken Evans Jr.	Guard	24	1-7	1-5	0-0	3	1	1	0	3
Niccolo Moretti	G	17	1-5	0-3	0-1	2	1	0	0	2

Tulane

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Asher Woods	G	37	6-10	2-3	6-8	3	2	0	0	20
Kaleb Banks	F	33	7-11	3-4	0-3	5	2	0	0	17
Gregg Glenn III	F	32	4-11	0-0	9-10	3	4	1	1	17
Rowan Brumbaugh	G	36	4-9	1-1	6-7	6	7	0	0	15
Mari Jordan	G	20	3-6	0-2	4-4	8	1	1	0	10
Kam Williams	G	34	1-5	0-3	0-0	6	1	1	2	2
Percy Daniels	C	8	1-2	0-0	0-0	3	1	0	0	2

Advanced Game Stats

64.8Possessions64.8

117.3Offensive Efficiency128.1

128.1Defensive Efficiency117.3

-10.8Net Efficiency10.8

42.8%Effective FG%53.7%

47.3%True Shooting %60.0%

6.1%Turnover Rate7.8%

34.8%Free Throw Rate59.3%

47.8%3-Point Rate24.1%

4.00Assist / Turnover3.60

Game Summary

Tulane won by 7 points. The game played at approximately 64.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.