Kent State

24-10

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

23.5%Kent State

76.5%Miami (OH)

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADMiami (OH) -9.7

PROJECTED TOTAL170.1

MODEL MONEYLINEMiami (OH) -326

Miami (OH)

32-2

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreKent State 80

Projected Total170.1

Projected ScoreMiami (OH) 90

Team Comparison

Kent StateMetricMiami (OH)

54.7MMH Power Index60.7

113.9Offensive Efficiency123.1

107.6Defensive Efficiency103.7

6.3Net Efficiency19.4

-0.1Strength of Schedule-5.6

2.1Last 10 Net Efficiency5.5

74.0Tempo72.8

53.0%Effective FG%60.6%

17.7%Turnover Rate14.2%

35.0%Offensive Rebound %26.3%

43.5%Free Throw Rate40.1%

4.7Average Margin14.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Miami (OH) HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY76.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMiami (OH) holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (60.7–54.7), offensive efficiency (123.1–113.9), defensive efficiency (103.7–107.6), net efficiency (19.4–6.3).

Kent State COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-0.1–-5.6), offensive rebounding (35.0–26.3), free throw rate (43.5–40.1).

Final

Kent State

64—72

Miami (OH)

Miami (OH) by 8 • 70.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Kent StateTEAM STATMiami (OH)

23-64FG23-56

36.0%FG%41.0%

7-243PT11-30

29.0%3PT%37.0%

11-21FT15-19

52.0%FT%79.0%

39Rebounds42

11Offensive Rebounds7

4Assists13

9Turnovers10

8Steals3

1Blocks4

16Fouls21

Player Box Score

Kent State

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jalen Sullinger	Guard	35	9-20	6-11	5-7	5	0	0	0	29
Marquis Barnett	Not Available	24	5-8	0-3	1-3	6	0	2	1	11
VonCameron Davis	Forward	37	4-17	0-4	2-4	5	0	1	0	10
Delrecco Gillespie	F	32	2-4	0-0	3-5	12	1	1	0	7
Cian Medley	G	36	1-8	1-5	0-1	4	3	2	0	3
Jamal Sumlin	G	15	1-6	0-1	0-0	3	0	0	0	2
Cli'Ron Hornbeak	Center	10	1-1	0-0	0-1	1	0	0	0	2
Mike Bekelja	Guard	10	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0	2	0	0
Magnus Entenmann	F	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Miami (OH)

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Peter Suder	G	37	8-14	3-6	4-4	11	4	0	0	23
Kam Craft	G	30	6-12	5-9	0-0	3	1	1	0	17
Eian Elmer	G	32	3-11	2-8	2-2	8	1	1	1	10
Reece Potter	F	21	2-8	0-3	2-2	3	0	0	0	6
Antwone Woolfolk	F	19	2-3	0-0	2-6	3	2	1	1	6
Evan Ipsaro	G	19	1-2	0-0	3-3	5	3	0	0	5
Brant Byers	G	11	1-5	1-3	2-2	2	1	0	1	5
Mekhi Cooper	G	22	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	1	0	0	0
Luke Skaljac	G	9	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	1	0

Advanced Game Stats

70.0Possessions70.0

91.4Offensive Efficiency102.9

102.9Defensive Efficiency91.4

-11.4Net Efficiency11.4

41.4%Effective FG%50.9%

43.3%True Shooting %55.4%

12.5%Turnover Rate14.7%

32.8%Free Throw Rate33.9%

37.5%3-Point Rate53.6%

0.44Assist / Turnover1.30

Game Summary

Miami (OH) won by 8 points. The game played at approximately 70.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, True Shooting %, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.