UAB logo

UAB

20-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
50.4%UAB
49.6%North Texas
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADNorth Texas -1.0
PROJECTED TOTAL146.5
MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -102
North Texas logo

North Texas

19-14
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUAB 73
Projected Total146.5
Projected ScoreNorth Texas 74

Team Comparison

56.9MMH Power Index52.2
110.5Offensive Efficiency104.1
102.9Defensive Efficiency99.1
7.6Net Efficiency5.0
0.4Strength of Schedule-1.3
2.9Last 10 Net Efficiency4.8
71.7Tempo68.1
48.8%Effective FG%47.6%
12.4%Turnover Rate16.7%
32.7%Offensive Rebound %33.6%
36.9%Free Throw Rate41.1%
5.4Average Margin3.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UAB HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY50.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.9–52.2), offensive efficiency (110.5–104.1), net efficiency (7.6–5.0), strength of schedule (0.4–-1.3).
North Texas COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (99.1–102.9), recent form (4.8–2.9), offensive rebounding (33.6–32.7).
Final
UAB logo
UAB
66—56
North Texas logo
North Texas
UAB by 10 • 60.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UABTEAM STATNorth Texas
24-56FG20-62
43.0%FG%32.0%
4-163PT4-18
25.0%3PT%22.0%
14-19FT12-16
74.0%FT%75.0%
37Rebounds39
14Offensive Rebounds19
13Assists9
8Turnovers11
4Steals6
5Blocks2
14Fouls14

Player Box Score

UAB
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Yaxel LendeborgF368-151-26-6134220023
Ja'Borri McGheeG345-91-35-964000016
Christian ColemanG313-80-00-05311006
Alejandro VasquezGuard213-80-00-04111006
Bradley EzewiroForward121-10-03-41001005
Butta JohnsonG242-80-50-02100004
Tony ToneyGuard361-51-40-03000003
Tyren MooreG61-21-20-00000003
North Texas
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Brenen LorientF316-150-10-0112200012
Atin WrightGuard304-142-102-221100012
Jasper FloydG313-81-22-22310009
Latrell JossellGuard243-71-40-03000007
Johnathan MassieGuard232-70-13-45220007
Moulaye SissokoForward272-40-02-24101006
Grant NewellF220-70-03-69001003
Rondel WalkerGuard120-00-00-01000000

Advanced Game Stats

60.3Possessions60.3
109.5Offensive Efficiency92.9
92.9Defensive Efficiency109.5
16.6Net Efficiency-16.6
46.4%Effective FG%35.5%
50.7%True Shooting %40.2%
13.6%Turnover Rate17.9%
33.9%Free Throw Rate25.8%
28.6%3-Point Rate29.0%
1.63Assist / Turnover0.82
Game Summary
UAB won by 10 points. The game played at approximately 60.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.