
Kent State
24-10GAME THAT MATTERSAT
42.6%Kent State
57.4%St. Bonaventure
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADSt. Bonaventure -2.3
PROJECTED TOTAL161.1
MODEL MONEYLINESt. Bonaventure -135

St. Bonaventure
17-17MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreKent State 79
Projected Total161.1
Projected ScoreSt. Bonaventure 82
Team Comparison
54.7MMH Power Index52.8
113.9Offensive Efficiency112.4
107.6Defensive Efficiency109.6
6.3Net Efficiency2.8
-0.1Strength of Schedule1.9
2.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.7
74.0Tempo67.9
53.0%Effective FG%52.9%
17.7%Turnover Rate16.8%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %34.5%
43.5%Free Throw Rate30.8%
4.7Average Margin1.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Kent State HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY57.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMKent State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.7–52.8), offensive efficiency (113.9–112.4), defensive efficiency (107.6–109.6), net efficiency (6.3–2.8).
St. Bonaventure COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.9–-0.1), ball security (16.8–17.7).