North Alabama

9-21

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

6.4%North Alabama

93.6%Bradley

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADBradley -18.4

PROJECTED TOTAL150.7

MODEL MONEYLINEBradley -1462

Bradley

21-13

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreNorth Alabama 66

Projected Total150.7

Projected ScoreBradley 85

Team Comparison

North AlabamaMetricBradley

34.9MMH Power Index54.4

104.4Offensive Efficiency110.5

116.7Defensive Efficiency105.3

-12.3Net Efficiency5.2

-1.2Strength of Schedule1.6

-16.3Last 10 Net Efficiency0.9

66.5Tempo69.9

48.9%Effective FG%51.2%

17.2%Turnover Rate13.9%

31.5%Offensive Rebound %27.7%

39.1%Free Throw Rate37.2%

-8.2Average Margin3.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Bradley HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY93.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBradley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.4–34.9), offensive efficiency (110.5–104.4), defensive efficiency (105.3–116.7), net efficiency (5.2–-12.3).

North Alabama COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (31.5–27.7), free throw rate (39.1–37.2).

Final

North Alabama

62—71

Bradley

Bradley by 9 • 69.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

North AlabamaTEAM STATBradley

20-58FG23-58

34.0%FG%40.0%

4-153PT8-27

27.0%3PT%30.0%

18-22FT17-28

82.0%FT%61.0%

44Rebounds38

13Offensive Rebounds10

7Assists14

15Turnovers7

3Steals7

2Blocks7

23Fouls17

Player Box Score

North Alabama

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Donte Bacchus	F	38	6-13	3-4	4-6	8	0	2	0	19
Jacari Lane	G	33	4-8	0-1	4-5	4	0	0	0	12
Will Soucie	Guard	27	2-10	0-2	4-4	6	1	0	0	8
Canin Jefferson	G	19	2-3	1-2	2-2	2	2	0	0	7
Corneilous Williams	F	32	2-6	0-0	2-3	12	1	1	2	6
Taye Fields	Guard	27	3-9	0-1	0-0	7	2	0	0	6
DarKaun King	F	12	1-5	0-3	0-0	2	1	0	0	2
Kevin de Kovachich	G	12	0-4	0-2	2-2	1	0	0	0	2

Bradley

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Darius Hannah	Forward	29	5-7	1-1	6-6	6	1	0	0	17
Christian Davis	Guard	32	5-11	3-7	0-0	6	4	0	3	13
Jaquan Johnson	G	19	4-10	1-3	2-6	2	1	4	0	11
Duke Deen	Guard	33	2-8	2-7	2-2	2	3	0	1	8
Timoty van der Knaap	G	20	3-8	0-2	2-4	3	1	1	0	8
Ahmet Jonovic	C	18	2-2	0-0	3-4	7	0	0	1	7
Demarion Burch	G	20	1-5	1-3	1-2	3	3	1	1	4
Connor Dillon	Guard	15	1-3	0-0	1-4	8	1	1	0	3
Almar Atlason	F	14	0-4	0-4	0-0	1	0	0	1	0

Advanced Game Stats

69.4Possessions69.4

89.3Offensive Efficiency102.3

102.3Defensive Efficiency89.3

-13.0Net Efficiency13.0

37.9%Effective FG%46.6%

45.3%True Shooting %49.8%

21.3%Turnover Rate10.2%

37.9%Free Throw Rate48.3%

25.9%3-Point Rate46.6%

0.47Assist / Turnover2.00

Game Summary

Bradley won by 9 points. The game played at approximately 69.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.