
Kent State
24-10GAME THAT MATTERSAT
26.7%Kent State
73.3%Stanford
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADStanford -6.1
PROJECTED TOTAL160.0
MODEL MONEYLINEStanford -275

Stanford
20-13MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreKent State 77
Projected Total160.0
Projected ScoreStanford 83
Team Comparison
54.7MMH Power Index59.2
113.9Offensive Efficiency111.6
107.6Defensive Efficiency107.1
6.3Net Efficiency4.5
-0.1Strength of Schedule5.2
2.1Last 10 Net Efficiency7.4
74.0Tempo68.1
53.0%Effective FG%51.9%
17.7%Turnover Rate15.5%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %32.4%
43.5%Free Throw Rate37.2%
4.7Average Margin3.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Kent State HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY73.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMKent State holds the advantage in offensive efficiency (113.9–111.6), net efficiency (6.3–4.5), shooting efficiency (53.0–51.9), offensive rebounding (35.0–32.4).
Stanford COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (59.2–54.7), defensive efficiency (107.1–107.6), strength of schedule (5.2–-0.1).