
Queens University
21-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
75.8%Queens University
24.2%Northern Arizona
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADQueens University -5.5
PROJECTED TOTAL161.7
MODEL MONEYLINEQueens University -313

Northern Arizona
10-22MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQueens University 84
Projected Total161.7
Projected ScoreNorthern Arizona 78
Team Comparison
51.7MMH Power Index36.9
118.4Offensive Efficiency107.1
117.0Defensive Efficiency114.8
1.4Net Efficiency-7.7
0.1Strength of Schedule-1.8
1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-16.5
71.4Tempo66.6
56.6%Effective FG%53.5%
14.8%Turnover Rate15.8%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %24.0%
37.6%Free Throw Rate33.6%
0.9Average Margin-5.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Queens University HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY75.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.7–36.9), offensive efficiency (118.4–107.1), net efficiency (1.4–-7.7), strength of schedule (0.1–-1.8).
Northern Arizona COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (114.8–117.0).