
Queens University
21-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
74.9%Queens University
25.1%Cleveland State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADQueens University -5.9
PROJECTED TOTAL173.1
MODEL MONEYLINEQueens University -298

Cleveland State
11-22MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQueens University 89
Projected Total173.1
Projected ScoreCleveland State 84
Team Comparison
51.7MMH Power Index37.3
118.4Offensive Efficiency111.6
117.0Defensive Efficiency120.2
1.4Net Efficiency-8.6
0.1Strength of Schedule-1.7
1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-14.6
71.4Tempo71.5
56.6%Effective FG%55.0%
14.8%Turnover Rate18.0%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %28.6%
37.6%Free Throw Rate38.7%
0.9Average Margin-6.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Queens University HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY74.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.7–37.3), offensive efficiency (118.4–111.6), defensive efficiency (117.0–120.2), net efficiency (1.4–-8.6).
Cleveland State COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (38.7–37.6).