Chattanooga

13-19

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

18.9%Chattanooga

81.1%Bradley

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADBradley -10.0

PROJECTED TOTAL153.8

MODEL MONEYLINEBradley -429

Bradley

21-13

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreChattanooga 72

Projected Total153.8

Projected ScoreBradley 82

Team Comparison

ChattanoogaMetricBradley

45.9MMH Power Index54.4

112.7Offensive Efficiency110.5

110.5Defensive Efficiency105.3

2.2Net Efficiency5.2

-4.4Strength of Schedule1.6

-0.1Last 10 Net Efficiency0.9

68.1Tempo69.9

55.1%Effective FG%51.2%

14.1%Turnover Rate13.9%

23.5%Offensive Rebound %27.7%

29.2%Free Throw Rate37.2%

1.4Average Margin3.6

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Bradley HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY81.1%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBradley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (54.4–45.9), defensive efficiency (105.3–110.5), net efficiency (5.2–2.2), strength of schedule (1.6–-4.4).

Chattanooga COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (112.7–110.5), shooting efficiency (55.1–51.2).

Final

Chattanooga

67—65

Bradley

Chattanooga by 2 • 61.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

ChattanoogaTEAM STATBradley

26-64FG26-48

41.0%FG%54.0%

11-363PT6-18

31.0%3PT%33.0%

4-6FT7-11

67.0%FT%64.0%

32Rebounds33

11Offensive Rebounds4

17Assists12

5Turnovers12

8Steals1

2Blocks3

13Fouls13

Player Box Score

Chattanooga

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Honor Huff	G	40	8-17	5-13	0-0	1	3	1	0	21
Trey Bonham	Guard	29	5-12	4-8	3-3	6	1	1	1	17
Bash Wieland	Guard	33	4-13	0-3	0-0	3	2	1	0	8
Collin Mulholland	F	17	2-4	1-2	1-1	5	3	0	0	6
Latif Diouf	F	12	2-2	0-0	0-1	7	3	0	1	4
Sean Cusano	G	6	2-3	0-1	0-1	0	1	0	0	4
Garrison Keeslar	Forward	36	1-7	1-5	0-0	5	3	2	0	3
Jack Kostel	Guard	14	1-5	0-4	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Makai Richards	C	11	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	2	0	2
Parker Robison	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	1	0	0

Bradley

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Demarion Burch	G	24	7-9	0-1	0-0	4	2	0	0	14
Duke Deen	Guard	36	5-9	2-6	1-2	4	4	0	1	13
Christian Davis	Guard	33	4-9	2-6	0-0	6	2	1	1	10
Jaquan Johnson	G	21	3-6	0-1	4-5	2	0	0	0	10
Ahmet Jonovic	C	29	4-7	0-0	0-2	6	1	0	1	8
Almar Atlason	F	20	1-3	1-2	2-2	2	1	0	0	5
Connor Dillon	Guard	14	1-2	1-1	0-0	0	1	0	0	3
Corey Thomas	F	11	1-2	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Timoty van der Knaap	G	12	0-1	0-0	0-0	2	1	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

61.1Possessions61.1

109.7Offensive Efficiency106.4

106.4Defensive Efficiency109.7

3.3Net Efficiency-3.3

49.2%Effective FG%60.4%

50.1%True Shooting %61.1%

8.2%Turnover Rate19.6%

9.4%Free Throw Rate22.9%

56.3%3-Point Rate37.5%

3.40Assist / Turnover1.00

Game Summary

Chattanooga won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 61.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Turnover Rate, Effective FG%.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.