
UAB
20-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
33.7%UAB
66.3%UC Irvine
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUC Irvine -6.1
PROJECTED TOTAL151.4
MODEL MONEYLINEUC Irvine -197

UC Irvine
23-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUAB 73
Projected Total151.4
Projected ScoreUC Irvine 79
Team Comparison
56.9MMH Power Index58.4
110.5Offensive Efficiency106.9
102.9Defensive Efficiency95.0
7.6Net Efficiency11.9
0.4Strength of Schedule-1.0
2.9Last 10 Net Efficiency10.0
71.7Tempo72.3
48.8%Effective FG%50.7%
12.4%Turnover Rate17.6%
32.7%Offensive Rebound %33.1%
36.9%Free Throw Rate36.5%
5.4Average Margin8.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UC Irvine HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY66.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUC Irvine holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.4–56.9), defensive efficiency (95.0–102.9), net efficiency (11.9–7.6), recent form (10.0–2.9).
UAB COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (110.5–106.9), strength of schedule (0.4–-1.0), ball security (12.4–17.6).