DePaul logo

DePaul

16-16
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
12.3%DePaul
87.7%Cincinnati
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCincinnati -12.8
PROJECTED TOTAL139.8
MODEL MONEYLINECincinnati -713
Cincinnati logo

Cincinnati

18-15
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreDePaul 64
Projected Total139.8
Projected ScoreCincinnati 76

Team Comparison

48.4MMH Power Index61.5
103.7Offensive Efficiency105.3
102.7Defensive Efficiency97.3
1.0Net Efficiency8.0
2.0Strength of Schedule5.1
-6.6Last 10 Net Efficiency14.4
67.7Tempo69.4
49.9%Effective FG%50.6%
17.8%Turnover Rate17.0%
29.7%Offensive Rebound %30.6%
36.8%Free Throw Rate30.7%
0.7Average Margin5.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Cincinnati HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY87.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCincinnati holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (61.5–48.4), offensive efficiency (105.3–103.7), defensive efficiency (97.3–102.7), net efficiency (8.0–1.0).
DePaul COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (36.8–30.7).
Final
DePaul logo
DePaul
61—83
Cincinnati logo
Cincinnati
Cincinnati by 22 • 73.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

DePaulTEAM STATCincinnati
21-50FG33-67
42.0%FG%49.0%
5-193PT9-21
26.0%3PT%43.0%
14-21FT8-12
67.0%FT%67.0%
30Rebounds38
5Offensive Rebounds11
6Assists16
19Turnovers12
6Steals16
4Blocks—
12Fouls20

Player Box Score

DePaul
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
CJ GunnG366-141-33-451300016
NJ BensonF345-60-15-992020015
Isaiah RiveraGuard404-73-53-551000014
David ThomasG285-101-30-041200011
Layden BlockerG231-80-33-33111005
Troy D'AmicoForward300-40-30-01001000
Chris RiddleF60-00-00-00000000
Théo Pierre-JustinF30-10-10-00000000
Cincinnati
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Dillon MitchellF277-100-01-273300015
Jizzle JamesG264-143-82-224100013
Day Day ThomasG255-83-30-055700013
Dan Skillings Jr.G226-80-10-051300012
Simas LukosiusGuard234-62-31-142100011
Aziz BandaogoForward224-60-03-550000011
Josh ReedF221-61-40-04100003
Halvine DzellatC151-40-01-23000003
Rayvon GriffithF161-30-10-01010002
Tyler BetseyF20-20-10-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

73.9Possessions73.9
82.5Offensive Efficiency112.3
112.3Defensive Efficiency82.5
-29.8Net Efficiency29.8
47.0%Effective FG%56.0%
50.9%True Shooting %57.1%
25.7%Turnover Rate16.3%
42.0%Free Throw Rate17.9%
38.0%3-Point Rate31.3%
0.32Assist / Turnover1.33
Game Summary
Cincinnati won by 22 points. The game played at approximately 73.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.