
DePaul
16-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
12.3%DePaul
87.7%Cincinnati
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCincinnati -12.8
PROJECTED TOTAL139.8
MODEL MONEYLINECincinnati -713

Cincinnati
18-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreDePaul 64
Projected Total139.8
Projected ScoreCincinnati 76
Team Comparison
48.4MMH Power Index61.5
103.7Offensive Efficiency105.3
102.7Defensive Efficiency97.3
1.0Net Efficiency8.0
2.0Strength of Schedule5.1
-6.6Last 10 Net Efficiency14.4
67.7Tempo69.4
49.9%Effective FG%50.6%
17.8%Turnover Rate17.0%
29.7%Offensive Rebound %30.6%
36.8%Free Throw Rate30.7%
0.7Average Margin5.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Cincinnati HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY87.7%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCincinnati holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (61.5–48.4), offensive efficiency (105.3–103.7), defensive efficiency (97.3–102.7), net efficiency (8.0–1.0).
DePaul COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (36.8–30.7).