
Tulane
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
27.8%Tulane
72.2%USC
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUSC -7.7
PROJECTED TOTAL154.7
MODEL MONEYLINEUSC -260

USC
18-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTulane 74
Projected Total154.7
Projected ScoreUSC 81
Team Comparison
44.3MMH Power Index48.3
105.3Offensive Efficiency108.5
109.9Defensive Efficiency107.6
-4.6Net Efficiency0.9
2.7Strength of Schedule2.5
-10.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-16.0
68.7Tempo72.4
49.6%Effective FG%50.7%
15.6%Turnover Rate17.2%
22.8%Offensive Rebound %33.2%
44.8%Free Throw Rate45.3%
-3.2Average Margin0.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
USC HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY72.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUSC holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (48.3–44.3), offensive efficiency (108.5–105.3), defensive efficiency (107.6–109.9), net efficiency (0.9–-4.6).
Tulane COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.7–2.5), recent form (-10.3–-16.0), ball security (15.6–17.2).