Nebraska

28-7

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

77.2%Nebraska

22.8%Georgetown

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADNebraska -7.6

PROJECTED TOTAL136.8

MODEL MONEYLINENebraska -339

Georgetown

13-18

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreNebraska 72

Projected Total136.8

Projected ScoreGeorgetown 65

Team Comparison

NebraskaMetricGeorgetown

67MMH Power Index51.5

114.4Offensive Efficiency107.2

98.3Defensive Efficiency107.4

16.1Net Efficiency-0.2

6.1Strength of Schedule4.4

6.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.8

67.3Tempo61.7

55.6%Effective FG%49.2%

14.4%Turnover Rate16.4%

26.3%Offensive Rebound %32.3%

26.9%Free Throw Rate38.3%

10.8Average Margin-0.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Nebraska HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY77.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNebraska holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (67.0–51.5), offensive efficiency (114.4–107.2), defensive efficiency (98.3–107.4), net efficiency (16.1–-0.2).

Georgetown COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (32.3–26.3), free throw rate (38.3–26.9).

Final

Nebraska

81—69

Georgetown

Nebraska by 12 • 68.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

NebraskaTEAM STATGeorgetown

28-59FG23-59

47.0%FG%39.0%

9-273PT12-30

33.0%3PT%40.0%

16-18FT11-16

89.0%FT%69.0%

40Rebounds31

10Offensive Rebounds9

15Assists8

10Turnovers11

9Steals6

3Blocks2

14Fouls13

Player Box Score

Nebraska

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Brice Williams	Guard	37	8-14	5-9	7-7	3	3	1	0	28
Juwan Gary	Forward	34	6-13	3-5	2-3	10	2	2	0	17
Andrew Morgan	Forward	20	4-5	0-0	4-5	9	0	0	1	12
Cale Jacobsen	G	36	3-7	0-1	1-1	6	4	3	2	7
Connor Essegian	G	14	3-8	1-6	0-0	1	1	1	0	7
Ahron Ulis	Guard	14	3-4	0-1	0-0	1	2	1	0	6
Sam Hoiberg	G	25	1-6	0-4	0-0	1	3	1	0	2
Berke Buyuktuncel	F	20	0-2	0-1	2-2	6	0	0	0	2

Georgetown

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Malik Mack	G	40	7-16	4-8	7-9	1	3	0	0	25
Jordan Burks	F	37	4-12	3-8	0-0	6	1	2	1	11
Caleb Williams	F	29	4-7	0-0	1-2	4	2	2	0	9
Kayvaun Mulready	G	29	3-5	3-4	0-0	3	1	1	0	9
Drew McKenna	G	19	2-8	0-2	2-3	5	0	0	0	6
Curtis Williams Jr.	G	30	1-6	1-5	1-2	3	1	1	0	4
Michael Van Raaphorst	G	4	1-1	1-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	3
Austin Montgomery	F	12	1-4	0-2	0-0	2	0	0	1	2

Advanced Game Stats

68.1Possessions68.1

118.9Offensive Efficiency101.3

101.3Defensive Efficiency118.9

17.6Net Efficiency-17.6

55.1%Effective FG%49.2%

60.0%True Shooting %51.8%

14.8%Turnover Rate16.0%

30.5%Free Throw Rate27.1%

45.8%3-Point Rate50.8%

1.50Assist / Turnover0.73

Game Summary

Nebraska won by 12 points. The game played at approximately 68.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.