
Chattanooga
13-19GAME THAT MATTERSAT
13.0%Chattanooga
87.0%UC Irvine
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUC Irvine -13.9
PROJECTED TOTAL151.0
MODEL MONEYLINEUC Irvine -669

UC Irvine
23-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreChattanooga 69
Projected Total151.0
Projected ScoreUC Irvine 82
Team Comparison
45.9MMH Power Index58.4
112.7Offensive Efficiency106.9
110.5Defensive Efficiency95.0
2.2Net Efficiency11.9
-4.4Strength of Schedule-1.0
-0.1Last 10 Net Efficiency10.0
68.1Tempo72.3
55.1%Effective FG%50.7%
14.1%Turnover Rate17.6%
23.5%Offensive Rebound %33.1%
29.2%Free Throw Rate36.5%
1.4Average Margin8.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UC Irvine HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY87.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUC Irvine holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.4–45.9), defensive efficiency (95.0–110.5), net efficiency (11.9–2.2), strength of schedule (-1.0–-4.4).
Chattanooga COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (112.7–106.9), shooting efficiency (55.1–50.7), ball security (14.1–17.6).