West Virginia logo

West Virginia

21-14
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
13.1%West Virginia
86.9%Virginia
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADVirginia -12.9
PROJECTED TOTAL143.0
MODEL MONEYLINEVirginia -663
Virginia logo

Virginia

30-6
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreWest Virginia 65
Projected Total143.0
Projected ScoreVirginia 78

Team Comparison

56.5MMH Power Index68.9
108.2Offensive Efficiency119.0
100.7Defensive Efficiency101.8
7.5Net Efficiency17.2
2.9Strength of Schedule5.2
1.8Last 10 Net Efficiency6.4
65.3Tempo67.6
51.5%Effective FG%55.0%
16.8%Turnover Rate16.0%
30.5%Offensive Rebound %37.4%
35.6%Free Throw Rate33.2%
4.9Average Margin11.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Virginia HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY86.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMVirginia holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.9–56.5), offensive efficiency (119.0–108.2), net efficiency (17.2–7.5), strength of schedule (5.2–2.9).
West Virginia COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (100.7–101.8), free throw rate (35.6–33.2).
Final
West Virginia logo
West Virginia
54—54
Virginia logo
Virginia
Tied • 61.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

West VirginiaTEAM STATVirginia
19-51FG19-51
37.3%FG%37.3%
7-213PT7-21
33.3%3PT%33.3%
9-13FT9-13
69.2%FT%69.2%
41Rebounds41
12Offensive Rebounds12
12Assists12
16Turnovers16
3Steals3
2Blocks2
13Fouls13

Player Box Score

West Virginia
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Quinn SlazinskiForward315-142-65-550000017
Jesse EdwardsCenter317-120-03-690120017
Seth WilsonGuard333-113-80-03000009
Kobe JohnsonGuard343-52-30-05610008
Patrick SuemnickF131-20-01-23000003
Josiah HarrisF320-50-40-04300000
Ofri NavehF260-20-00-07310000
Virginia
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Quinn SlazinskiForward315-142-65-550000017
Jesse EdwardsCenter317-120-03-690120017
Seth WilsonGuard333-113-80-03000009
Kobe JohnsonGuard343-52-30-05610008
Patrick SuemnickF131-20-01-23000003
Josiah HarrisF320-50-40-04300000
Ofri NavehF260-20-00-07310000

Advanced Game Stats

61.2Possessions61.2
88.2Offensive Efficiency88.2
88.2Defensive Efficiency88.2
0.0Net Efficiency0.0
44.1%Effective FG%44.1%
47.2%True Shooting %47.2%
26.2%Turnover Rate26.2%
25.5%Free Throw Rate25.5%
41.2%3-Point Rate41.2%
0.75Assist / Turnover0.75
Game Summary
Neither team finished level. The game played at approximately 61.2 possessions.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.