Penn State logo

Penn State

12-20
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
9.5%Penn State
90.5%Texas A&M
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTexas A&M -16.1
PROJECTED TOTAL157.1
MODEL MONEYLINETexas A&M -953
Texas A&M logo

Texas A&M

20-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScorePenn State 71
Projected Total157.1
Projected ScoreTexas A&M 87

Team Comparison

42.3MMH Power Index58
109.2Offensive Efficiency116.1
117.6Defensive Efficiency108.4
-8.4Net Efficiency7.7
5.3Strength of Schedule4.8
-20.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-7.2
67.5Tempo69.1
53.4%Effective FG%53.5%
15.6%Turnover Rate14.8%
25.6%Offensive Rebound %31.7%
34.6%Free Throw Rate37.5%
-5.7Average Margin5.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Texas A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY90.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTexas A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.0–42.3), offensive efficiency (116.1–109.2), defensive efficiency (108.4–117.6), net efficiency (7.7–-8.4).
Penn State COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.3–4.8).
Final
Penn State logo
Penn State
77—89
Texas A&M logo
Texas A&M
Texas A&M by 12 • 65.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Penn StateTEAM STATTexas A&M
28-53FG34-57
52.8%FG%59.6%
6-193PT5-14
31.6%3PT%35.7%
15-22FT16-21
68.2%FT%76.2%
20Rebounds33
7Offensive Rebounds12
9Assists12
9Turnovers10
5Steals3
1Blocks1
19Fouls17

Player Box Score

Penn State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Kanye ClaryG328-140-23-424100019
Puff JohnsonG295-81-24-540000015
Ace Baldwin Jr.Guard364-103-61-202100012
Qudus WahabForward244-50-01-25121009
Nick Kern Jr.Guard243-50-13-52210009
Zach HicksForward262-81-60-02000005
D'Marco DunnGuard82-21-10-01000005
RayQuawndis MitchellGuard70-00-03-41000003
Leo O'BoyleForward90-00-00-01000000
Jameel BrownG50-10-10-00000000
Texas A&M
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Henry Coleman IIIForward338-110-08-1061100024
Wade Taylor IVGuard328-132-55-763100023
Tyrece RadfordGuard337-120-20-061000014
Jace CarterNot Available242-91-31-24000006
Solomon WashingtonF153-30-00-03100006
Hayden HefnerGuard152-31-20-00100005
Manny ObasekiGuard72-30-00-00000004
Eli LawrenceGuard81-21-20-01100003
Andersson GarciaForward281-10-00-05410002
Wildens LevequeForward50-00-02-21001002

Advanced Game Stats

65.3Possessions65.3
117.9Offensive Efficiency136.3
136.3Defensive Efficiency117.9
-18.4Net Efficiency18.4
58.5%Effective FG%64.0%
60.7%True Shooting %66.4%
13.8%Turnover Rate15.4%
41.5%Free Throw Rate36.8%
35.8%3-Point Rate24.6%
1.00Assist / Turnover1.20
Game Summary
Texas A&M won by 12 points. The game played at approximately 65.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.