
Texas A&M
20-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
39.9%Texas A&M
60.1%UCF
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUCF -2.9
PROJECTED TOTAL160.8
MODEL MONEYLINEUCF -151

UCF
21-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTexas A&M 79
Projected Total160.8
Projected ScoreUCF 82
Team Comparison
58MMH Power Index57.1
116.1Offensive Efficiency113.3
108.4Defensive Efficiency110.0
7.7Net Efficiency3.3
4.8Strength of Schedule6.6
-7.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-3.8
69.1Tempo71.2
53.5%Effective FG%53.0%
14.8%Turnover Rate16.0%
31.7%Offensive Rebound %34.3%
37.5%Free Throw Rate31.1%
5.3Average Margin2.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Texas A&M HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY60.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTexas A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.0–57.1), offensive efficiency (116.1–113.3), defensive efficiency (108.4–110.0), net efficiency (7.7–3.3).
UCF COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (6.6–4.8), recent form (-3.8–-7.2), offensive rebounding (34.3–31.7).