Texas Southern

12-17

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

1.6%Texas Southern

98.4%Purdue

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADPurdue -26.1

PROJECTED TOTAL151.9

MODEL MONEYLINEPurdue -6150

Purdue

30-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreTexas Southern 63

Projected Total151.9

Projected ScorePurdue 89

Team Comparison

Texas SouthernMetricPurdue

40.8MMH Power Index73.2

104.2Offensive Efficiency124.8

106.7Defensive Efficiency107.8

-2.5Net Efficiency17.0

-6.3Strength of Schedule7.6

3.5Last 10 Net Efficiency11.8

69.8Tempo65.4

50.3%Effective FG%57.8%

18.4%Turnover Rate13.7%

29.2%Offensive Rebound %36.2%

39.3%Free Throw Rate29.1%

-1.8Average Margin11.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Purdue HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY98.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPurdue holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (73.2–40.8), offensive efficiency (124.8–104.2), net efficiency (17.0–-2.5), strength of schedule (7.6–-6.3).

Texas Southern COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (106.7–107.8), free throw rate (39.3–29.1).

Final

Texas Southern

67—99

Purdue

Purdue by 32 • 76.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Texas SouthernTEAM STATPurdue

26-70FG29-55

37.1%FG%52.7%

9-303PT13-25

30.0%3PT%52.0%

6-9FT28-40

66.7%FT%70.0%

29Rebounds46

6Offensive Rebounds8

12Assists19

9Turnovers10

7Steals4

3Blocks6

27Fouls12

Player Box Score

Texas Southern

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Zytarious Mortle	G	26	10-22	2-5	3-3	6	1	3	1	25
PJ Henry	Guard	21	4-12	2-8	0-0	0	0	1	0	10
Xavier Ball	Forward	11	2-4	2-4	0-0	0	1	0	0	6
Deon Stroud	Guard	32	2-6	0-3	1-2	7	7	0	0	5
Kenny Hunter	Forward	21	2-5	0-1	1-2	2	0	1	1	5
Kehlin Farooq	G	19	2-6	0-1	1-2	5	1	1	1	5
Zaire Hayes	G	12	2-2	1-1	0-0	1	1	0	0	5
Kolby Granger	G	17	1-5	1-3	0-0	3	0	1	0	3
Jaylen Wysinger	G	9	1-2	1-2	0-0	0	1	0	0	3
Jahmar Young Jr.	Forward	13	0-3	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Grayson Carter	Forward	12	0-2	0-2	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Mario Davis	Guard	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Purdue

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Braden Smith	G	25	6-12	2-4	5-5	9	10	1	1	19
Zach Edey	Center	21	4-4	0-0	7-10	6	0	0	3	15
Lance Jones	Guard	21	4-6	4-5	3-4	3	2	2	0	15
Trey Kaufman-Renn	F	17	4-6	1-1	3-6	5	0	0	1	12
Mason Gillis	Forward	18	3-5	3-3	2-2	5	0	0	0	11
Myles Colvin	G	16	2-7	2-6	3-4	1	1	0	0	9
William Berg	C	8	3-4	0-0	1-2	3	0	0	0	7
Fletcher Loyer	G	17	1-4	1-2	2-2	1	1	0	0	5
Caleb Furst	Forward	15	0-2	0-1	2-3	3	0	0	0	2
Camden Heide	F	14	1-2	0-1	0-0	4	1	0	1	2
Chase Martin	Guard	1	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Ethan Morton	Guard	18	0-1	0-1	0-2	1	3	1	0	0
Brian Waddell	F	8	0-1	0-1	0-0	2	1	0	0	0
Carson Barrett	Guard	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

76.7Possessions76.7

87.4Offensive Efficiency129.1

129.1Defensive Efficiency87.4

-41.7Net Efficiency41.7

43.6%Effective FG%64.5%

45.1%True Shooting %66.9%

11.6%Turnover Rate13.2%

12.9%Free Throw Rate72.7%

42.9%3-Point Rate45.5%

1.33Assist / Turnover1.90

Game Summary

Purdue won by 32 points. The game played at approximately 76.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.