Clemson

24-10

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

17.1%Clemson

82.9%Alabama

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADAlabama -9.8

PROJECTED TOTAL157.6

MODEL MONEYLINEAlabama -485

Alabama

24-10

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreClemson 74

Projected Total157.6

Projected ScoreAlabama 84

Team Comparison

ClemsonMetricAlabama

59.9MMH Power Index69.5

112.6Offensive Efficiency121.6

101.4Defensive Efficiency111.2

11.2Net Efficiency10.4

4.6Strength of Schedule9.4

-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency9.5

63.6Tempo74.7

53.0%Effective FG%54.9%

14.0%Turnover Rate13.0%

27.0%Offensive Rebound %32.1%

38.1%Free Throw Rate36.9%

7.2Average Margin7.7

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Alabama HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY82.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAlabama holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (69.5–59.9), offensive efficiency (121.6–112.6), strength of schedule (9.4–4.6), recent form (9.5–-4.7).

Clemson COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (101.4–111.2), net efficiency (11.2–10.4), free throw rate (38.1–36.9).

Final

Clemson

85—77

Alabama

Clemson by 8 • 70.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

ClemsonTEAM STATAlabama

32-60FG23-67

53.3%FG%34.3%

11-213PT11-35

52.4%3PT%31.4%

10-15FT20-26

66.7%FT%76.9%

41Rebounds41

8Offensive Rebounds16

12Assists12

11Turnovers7

4Steals7

7Blocks3

22Fouls15

Player Box Score

Clemson

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
PJ Hall	Center	21	6-11	3-5	6-7	8	2	1	4	21
Joseph Girard III	Guard	33	5-10	4-7	2-2	2	4	2	0	16
Chase Hunter	Guard	29	6-11	3-5	0-0	3	1	0	0	15
RJ Godfrey	F	14	5-6	0-0	1-1	3	1	0	0	11
Ian Schieffelin	Forward	30	4-9	0-1	1-3	14	2	0	2	9
Joshua Beadle	G	12	3-3	0-0	0-1	0	0	0	0	6
Dillon Hunter	G	18	1-4	1-1	0-1	4	1	1	0	3
Chauncey Wiggins	F	17	1-4	0-1	0-0	4	1	0	0	2
Bas Leyte	Forward	14	1-1	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	1	2
Jack Clark	Forward	12	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Alabama

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Mark Sears	Guard	34	7-14	4-9	5-7	4	3	0	1	23
Aaron Estrada	Guard	31	6-16	2-8	2-2	5	1	1	0	16
Grant Nelson	Forward	33	4-15	2-8	4-4	8	1	2	2	14
Rylan Griffen	G	28	1-7	1-4	3-4	5	2	1	0	6
Mohamed Wague	F	15	2-5	0-0	2-3	3	0	1	0	6
Latrell Wrightsell	G	22	1-4	1-2	2-2	4	1	2	0	5
Nick Pringle	F	21	1-1	0-0	2-4	5	2	0	0	4
Sam Walters	F	8	1-4	1-3	0-0	0	1	0	0	3
Jarin Stevenson	F	8	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	1	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

70.3Possessions70.3

120.9Offensive Efficiency109.5

109.5Defensive Efficiency120.9

11.4Net Efficiency-11.4

62.5%Effective FG%42.5%

63.3%True Shooting %48.5%

15.7%Turnover Rate10.0%

25.0%Free Throw Rate38.8%

35.0%3-Point Rate52.2%

1.09Assist / Turnover1.71

Game Summary

Clemson won by 8 points. The game played at approximately 70.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Effective FG%, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.