Texas State logo

Texas State

19-13
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
13.4%Texas State
86.6%Texas
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTexas -12.2
PROJECTED TOTAL154.3
MODEL MONEYLINETexas -646
Texas logo

Texas

21-15
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTexas State 71
Projected Total154.3
Projected ScoreTexas 83

Team Comparison

49.4MMH Power Index61.6
107.7Offensive Efficiency119.6
103.4Defensive Efficiency110.1
4.3Net Efficiency9.5
-4.7Strength of Schedule5.3
9.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.4
68.6Tempo69.2
51.3%Effective FG%55.1%
18.4%Turnover Rate15.5%
34.3%Offensive Rebound %35.9%
36.0%Free Throw Rate44.3%
2.9Average Margin6.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Texas HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY86.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTexas holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (61.6–49.4), offensive efficiency (119.6–107.7), net efficiency (9.5–4.3), strength of schedule (5.3–-4.7).
Texas State COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (103.4–110.1), recent form (9.1–-5.4).
Final
Texas State logo
Texas State
58—58
Texas logo
Texas
Tied • 68.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Texas StateTEAM STATTexas
24-58FG24-58
41.4%FG%41.4%
3-93PT3-9
33.3%3PT%33.3%
7-14FT7-14
50.0%FT%50.0%
31Rebounds31
9Offensive Rebounds9
4Assists4
13Turnovers13
8Steals8
4Blocks4
19Fouls19

Player Box Score

Texas State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Dylan DawsonGuard324-92-45-631110015
Brandon LoveForward306-140-02-650320014
Jordan MasonG285-120-30-042000010
Joshua O'GarroG254-70-00-05001008
Elijah TateGuard223-41-10-03010007
Christian TurnerForward321-60-00-26020002
Dontae HorneG221-30-10-03110002
Chris NixForward90-30-00-01000000
Texas
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Dylan DawsonGuard324-92-45-631110015
Brandon LoveForward306-140-02-650320014
Jordan MasonG285-120-30-042000010
Joshua O'GarroG254-70-00-05001008
Elijah TateGuard223-41-10-03010007
Christian TurnerForward321-60-00-26020002
Dontae HorneG221-30-10-03110002
Chris NixForward90-30-00-01000000

Advanced Game Stats

68.7Possessions68.7
84.4Offensive Efficiency84.4
84.4Defensive Efficiency84.4
0.0Net Efficiency0.0
44.0%Effective FG%44.0%
44.9%True Shooting %44.9%
18.9%Turnover Rate18.9%
24.1%Free Throw Rate24.1%
15.5%3-Point Rate15.5%
0.31Assist / Turnover0.31
Game Summary
Neither team finished level. The game played at approximately 68.7 possessions.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.