
George Mason
23-10GAME THAT MATTERSAT
13.9%George Mason
86.1%Tennessee
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTennessee -12.3
PROJECTED TOTAL145.5
MODEL MONEYLINETennessee -619

Tennessee
25-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreGeorge Mason 67
Projected Total145.5
Projected ScoreTennessee 79
Team Comparison
56.8MMH Power Index68.6
112.9Offensive Efficiency115.8
104.5Defensive Efficiency102.1
8.4Net Efficiency13.7
2.8Strength of Schedule7.8
-5.0Last 10 Net Efficiency3.3
64.9Tempo68.1
53.4%Effective FG%51.6%
16.3%Turnover Rate17.3%
31.7%Offensive Rebound %44.5%
43.6%Free Throw Rate38.6%
5.5Average Margin9.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Tennessee HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY86.1%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTennessee holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (68.6–56.8), offensive efficiency (115.8–112.9), defensive efficiency (102.1–104.5), net efficiency (13.7–8.4).
George Mason COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (53.4–51.6), ball security (16.3–17.3), free throw rate (43.6–38.6).