DePaul

16-16

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

17.1%DePaul

82.9%Texas A&M

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADTexas A&M -10.6

PROJECTED TOTAL148.7

MODEL MONEYLINETexas A&M -485

Texas A&M

20-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreDePaul 69

Projected Total148.7

Projected ScoreTexas A&M 80

Team Comparison

DePaulMetricTexas A&M

48.4MMH Power Index58

103.7Offensive Efficiency116.1

102.7Defensive Efficiency108.4

1.0Net Efficiency7.7

2.0Strength of Schedule4.8

-6.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-7.2

67.7Tempo69.1

49.9%Effective FG%53.5%

17.8%Turnover Rate14.8%

29.7%Offensive Rebound %31.7%

36.8%Free Throw Rate37.5%

0.7Average Margin5.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Texas A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY82.9%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTexas A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.0–48.4), offensive efficiency (116.1–103.7), net efficiency (7.7–1.0), strength of schedule (4.8–2.0).

DePaul COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.7–108.4), recent form (-6.6–-7.2).

Final

DePaul

64—89

Texas A&M

Texas A&M by 25 • 59.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

DePaulTEAM STATTexas A&M

23-42FG35-66

54.8%FG%53.0%

8-163PT14-31

50.0%3PT%45.2%

10-17FT5-9

58.8%FT%55.6%

23Rebounds30

5Offensive Rebounds15

15Assists20

15Turnovers4

2Steals9

3Blocks2

13Fouls14

Player Box Score

DePaul

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Chico Carter Jr.	Guard	34	7-9	4-6	3-6	1	4	0	0	21
Da'Sean Nelson	Forward	35	6-8	1-2	0-0	6	3	1	0	13
Keyondre Young	G	12	3-6	1-2	3-4	4	1	1	0	10
Elijah Fisher	G	28	2-4	0-1	2-4	3	2	0	2	6
Jaden Henley	G	21	2-3	0-0	2-3	1	3	0	0	6
Jeremiah Oden	F	24	1-6	1-2	0-0	2	0	0	0	3
K.T. Raimey	Guard	19	1-3	1-3	0-0	1	2	0	0	3
Churchill Abass	F	7	1-1	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	0	2
Caleb Murphy	Not Available	13	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Mac Etienne	Forward	7	0-1	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	1	0

Texas A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jace Carter	Not Available	25	5-12	4-11	0-0	1	1	0	0	14
Henry Coleman III	Forward	26	6-10	0-0	1-1	9	3	2	0	13
Wade Taylor IV	Guard	25	4-10	4-7	1-2	2	6	1	0	13
Hayden Hefner	Guard	24	4-8	2-5	0-0	4	3	2	0	10
Manny Obaseki	Guard	22	4-7	1-1	1-2	0	2	0	0	10
Bryce Lindsay	G	15	4-8	2-6	0-0	0	1	0	0	10
Andersson Garcia	Forward	22	3-3	1-1	2-3	5	2	2	1	9
Wildens Leveque	Forward	16	2-3	0-0	0-0	4	1	0	0	4
Solomon Washington	F	14	1-2	0-0	0-1	3	1	1	0	2
Eli Lawrence	Guard	8	1-2	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	2
Jaelyn Lee	G	3	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	1	2

Advanced Game Stats

59.7Possessions59.7

107.2Offensive Efficiency149.1

149.1Defensive Efficiency107.2

-41.9Net Efficiency41.9

64.3%Effective FG%63.6%

63.9%True Shooting %63.3%

25.0%Turnover Rate6.7%

40.5%Free Throw Rate13.6%

38.1%3-Point Rate47.0%

1.00Assist / Turnover5.00

Game Summary

Texas A&M won by 25 points. The game played at approximately 59.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.