
Stonehill
12-21GAME THAT MATTERSAT
61.6%Stonehill
38.4%Rider
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADStonehill -3.6
PROJECTED TOTAL136.2
MODEL MONEYLINEStonehill -160

Rider
4-25MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreStonehill 70
Projected Total136.2
Projected ScoreRider 66
Team Comparison
37.9MMH Power Index29.1
97.5Offensive Efficiency96.3
100.7Defensive Efficiency115.3
-3.2Net Efficiency-19.0
-5.4Strength of Schedule-0.9
-3.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-17.7
68.1Tempo65.9
48.0%Effective FG%43.4%
19.1%Turnover Rate17.1%
28.4%Offensive Rebound %32.8%
29.2%Free Throw Rate31.5%
-2.2Average Margin-12.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Stonehill HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY61.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMStonehill holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (37.9–29.1), offensive efficiency (97.5–96.3), defensive efficiency (100.7–115.3), net efficiency (-3.2–-19.0).
Rider COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-0.9–-5.4), ball security (17.1–19.1), offensive rebounding (32.8–28.4).