Army

11-21

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

9.4%Army

90.6%Harvard

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADHarvard -15.3

PROJECTED TOTAL143.3

MODEL MONEYLINEHarvard -964

Harvard

17-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreArmy 64

Projected Total143.3

Projected ScoreHarvard 79

Team Comparison

ArmyMetricHarvard

36.8MMH Power Index52.6

104.8Offensive Efficiency108.1

112.1Defensive Efficiency102.9

-7.3Net Efficiency5.2

-3.3Strength of Schedule-0.1

-10.6Last 10 Net Efficiency8.3

68.9Tempo64.8

49.8%Effective FG%53.4%

17.3%Turnover Rate17.2%

31.0%Offensive Rebound %26.3%

26.5%Free Throw Rate27.9%

-5.1Average Margin3.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Harvard HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY90.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHarvard holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.6–36.8), offensive efficiency (108.1–104.8), defensive efficiency (102.9–112.1), net efficiency (5.2–-7.3).

Army COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (31.0–26.3).

Final

Army

64—70

Harvard

Harvard by 6 • 65.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

ArmyTEAM STATHarvard

22-66FG20-45

33.3%FG%44.4%

9-323PT9-24

28.1%3PT%37.5%

11-16FT21-28

68.8%FT%75.0%

44Rebounds33

18Offensive Rebounds4

9Assists8

10Turnovers11

4Steals4

4Blocks3

23Fouls17

Player Box Score

Army

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
TJ Small	Guard	31	7-17	4-12	2-3	3	0	2	1	20
Ryan Curry	G	37	4-15	2-9	3-4	5	5	0	0	13
Blake Barker	Guard	16	3-7	2-5	0-1	3	0	1	0	8
Kendall Hailey	Guard	27	1-3	0-1	5-6	6	0	0	1	7
Abe Johnson	Forward	22	2-3	0-0	1-2	13	1	0	1	5
Josh Scovens	F	30	2-15	0-4	0-0	7	1	0	1	4
AJ Allenspach	Forward	19	2-4	0-0	0-0	3	0	1	0	4
Jared Cross	Guard	5	1-1	1-1	0-0	1	1	0	0	3
Charlie Peterson	Forward	9	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Dylan Blair	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0	0
Kwabena Davis	Guard	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Harvard

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Malik Mack	G	32	4-11	2-5	7-11	4	4	1	0	17
Chisom Okpara	F	27	4-5	1-1	8-10	4	1	0	2	17
Chandler Pigge	G	37	5-7	0-1	4-5	4	0	1	0	14
Louis Lesmond	G	37	3-11	3-10	2-2	6	0	0	0	11
Xavier Nesbitt	G	8	2-4	2-3	0-0	2	0	0	0	6
Denham Wojcik	G	20	1-1	1-1	0-0	4	2	0	0	3
Tyler Simon	F	6	1-2	0-1	0-0	0	0	2	0	2
Thomas Batties II	F	25	0-4	0-2	0-0	3	1	0	1	0
Luca Ace-Nasteski	F	8	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

65.4Possessions65.4

97.9Offensive Efficiency107.0

107.0Defensive Efficiency97.9

-9.2Net Efficiency9.2

40.2%Effective FG%54.4%

43.5%True Shooting %60.0%

15.2%Turnover Rate16.8%

24.2%Free Throw Rate62.2%

48.5%3-Point Rate53.3%

0.90Assist / Turnover0.73

Game Summary

Harvard won by 6 points. The game played at approximately 65.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.