
Navy
26-8GAME THAT MATTERSAT
53.4%Navy
46.6%Quinnipiac
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADNavy -0.5
PROJECTED TOTAL143.4
MODEL MONEYLINENavy -115

Quinnipiac
19-13MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreNavy 72
Projected Total143.4
Projected ScoreQuinnipiac 71
Team Comparison
56.8MMH Power Index51
113.2Offensive Efficiency106.8
97.6Defensive Efficiency102.1
15.6Net Efficiency4.7
-8.1Strength of Schedule-2.3
16.4Last 10 Net Efficiency2.2
65.9Tempo70.5
53.7%Effective FG%48.9%
17.1%Turnover Rate15.6%
33.2%Offensive Rebound %34.1%
40.9%Free Throw Rate34.1%
10.3Average Margin3.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Navy HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY53.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNavy holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.8–51.0), offensive efficiency (113.2–106.8), defensive efficiency (97.6–102.1), net efficiency (15.6–4.7).
Quinnipiac COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-2.3–-8.1), ball security (15.6–17.1), offensive rebounding (34.1–33.2).