Texas A&M-Corpus Christi

18-15

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

3.8%Texas A&M-Corpus Christi

96.2%Purdue

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADPurdue -19.6

PROJECTED TOTAL147.4

MODEL MONEYLINEPurdue -2532

Purdue

30-9

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreTexas A&M-Corpus Christi 64

Projected Total147.4

Projected ScorePurdue 83

Team Comparison

Texas A&M-Corpus ChristiMetricPurdue

48.7MMH Power Index73.2

105.9Offensive Efficiency124.8

98.9Defensive Efficiency107.8

7.0Net Efficiency17.0

-5.9Strength of Schedule7.6

4.4Last 10 Net Efficiency11.8

68.4Tempo65.4

51.6%Effective FG%57.8%

19.3%Turnover Rate13.7%

33.3%Offensive Rebound %36.2%

39.9%Free Throw Rate29.1%

4.8Average Margin11.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Purdue HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY96.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPurdue holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (73.2–48.7), offensive efficiency (124.8–105.9), net efficiency (17.0–7.0), strength of schedule (7.6–-5.9).

Texas A&M-Corpus Christi COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (98.9–107.8), free throw rate (39.9–29.1).

Final

Texas A&M-Corpus Christi

73—90

Purdue

Purdue by 17 • 73.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Texas A&M-Corpus ChristiTEAM STATPurdue

30-67FG31-55

44.8%FG%56.4%

6-193PT11-26

31.6%3PT%42.3%

7-7FT17-27

100.0%FT%63.0%

27Rebounds39

7Offensive Rebounds10

14Assists24

9Turnovers16

10Steals4

—Blocks6

25Fouls7

Player Box Score

Texas A&M-Corpus Christi

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Owen Dease	F	30	8-11	2-3	2-2	7	0	3	20
Garry Clark	F	32	6-14	2-5	0-0	4	0	0	14
Isaac Williams IV	G	29	6-13	0-1	0-0	1	4	3	12
Dian Wright-Forde	G	16	2-2	1-1	5-5	2	2	0	10
Jordan Roberts	Guard	26	3-9	1-4	0-0	2	1	0	7
Aaron Potter	Guard	19	2-6	0-3	0-0	3	3	3	4
Sheldon Williams	F	14	1-3	0-1	0-0	1	2	0	2
Shilo Jackson	F	12	1-3	0-0	0-0	1	1	0	2
Damarion Dennis	G	5	1-3	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	2
Leo Torbor	G	11	0-2	0-0	0-0	3	0	1	0
Kam Parker	G	6	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	0

Purdue

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Fletcher Loyer	G	31	6-10	3-5	6-7	1	2	0	0	21
Trey Kaufman-Renn	F	33	7-12	1-3	0-0	9	3	1	1	15
Myles Colvin	G	17	5-9	4-7	0-0	4	1	0	0	14
Daniel Jacobsen	C	25	4-6	0-1	5-7	7	0	0	3	13
Braden Smith	G	35	3-6	1-3	5-6	8	15	2	0	12
Gicarri Harris	G	23	2-5	1-4	0-0	1	1	0	0	5
Will Berg	C	8	2-2	0-0	1-6	1	1	0	0	5
C.J. Cox	G	11	1-1	1-1	0-1	2	1	1	0	3
Caleb Furst	Forward	2	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	1	2
Camden Heide	F	10	0-2	0-2	0-0	3	0	0	1	0
Raleigh Burgess	F	5	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

73.1Possessions73.1

99.9Offensive Efficiency123.1

123.1Defensive Efficiency99.9

-23.3Net Efficiency23.3

49.3%Effective FG%66.4%

51.9%True Shooting %66.3%

12.4%Turnover Rate21.7%

10.4%Free Throw Rate49.1%

28.4%3-Point Rate47.3%

1.56Assist / Turnover1.50

Game Summary

Purdue won by 17 points. The game played at approximately 73.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.