BYU logo

BYU

23-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
84.8%BYU
15.2%Utah
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADBYU -10.8
PROJECTED TOTAL159.7
MODEL MONEYLINEBYU -558
Utah logo

Utah

10-22
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBYU 85
Projected Total159.7
Projected ScoreUtah 74

Team Comparison

BYUMetricUtah
63.9MMH Power Index43.9
118.3Offensive Efficiency108.8
106.8Defensive Efficiency115.8
11.5Net Efficiency-7.0
6.5Strength of Schedule5.1
-2.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-16.3
70.6Tempo68.3
54.7%Effective FG%52.3%
15.2%Turnover Rate16.7%
33.7%Offensive Rebound %28.8%
35.4%Free Throw Rate32.2%
8.1Average Margin-4.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

BYU HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY84.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
11–0
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBYU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (63.9–43.9), offensive efficiency (118.3–108.8), defensive efficiency (106.8–115.8), net efficiency (11.5–-7.0).
Final
BYU logo
BYU
69—73
Utah logo
Utah
Utah by 4 • 69.4 estimated possessions

Team Stats

BYUTEAM STATUtah
26-71FG28-57
37.0%FG%49.0%
7-303PT8-26
23.0%3PT%31.0%
10-18FT9-13
56.0%FT%69.0%
42Rebounds41
17Offensive Rebounds8
13Assists19
8Turnovers13
6Steals4
1Blocks5
20Fouls16

Player Box Score

BYU
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Jaxson RobinsonGuard277-133-80-110000017
Richie SaundersG225-92-41-360210013
Dallin HallG284-121-32-322100011
Trevin KnellGuard273-80-44-632100010
Spencer JohnsonGuard254-121-31-2110200010
Aly KhalifaC261-50-12-35600004
Trey StewartGuard121-40-10-04100002
Atiki Ally AtikiForward111-10-00-00100002
Noah WatermanForward210-70-60-03100000
Townsend TrippleForward10-00-00-01000000
Utah
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Gabe MadsenGuard366-115-90-043100017
Branden CarlsonCenter326-131-52-382100015
Keba KeitaF145-60-00-160010010
Cole BajemaGuard184-61-30-06000009
Hunter EricksonG283-61-31-11200008
Rollie WorsterGuard372-100-43-46821007
Lawson LoveringCenter232-40-11-23403005
Ben CarlsonForward120-10-12-20000002

Advanced Game Stats

69.4Possessions69.4
99.4Offensive Efficiency105.2
105.2Defensive Efficiency99.4
-5.8Net Efficiency5.8
41.5%Effective FG%56.1%
43.4%True Shooting %57.8%
11.3%Turnover Rate19.1%
25.4%Free Throw Rate22.8%
42.3%3-Point Rate45.6%
1.63Assist / Turnover1.46
Game Summary
Utah won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 69.4 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Effective FG%, True Shooting %, Net Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.