
TCU
23-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
37.0%TCU
63.0%Clemson
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADClemson -4.5
PROJECTED TOTAL143.0
MODEL MONEYLINEClemson -170

Clemson
24-10MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTCU 69
Projected Total143.0
Projected ScoreClemson 74
Team Comparison
59.7MMH Power Index59.9
110.2Offensive Efficiency112.6
102.7Defensive Efficiency101.4
7.5Net Efficiency11.2
4.6Strength of Schedule4.6
2.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7
70.2Tempo63.6
50.5%Effective FG%53.0%
15.3%Turnover Rate14.0%
33.6%Offensive Rebound %27.0%
38.3%Free Throw Rate38.1%
5.3Average Margin7.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Clemson HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY63.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–59.7), offensive efficiency (112.6–110.2), defensive efficiency (101.4–102.7), net efficiency (11.2–7.5).
TCU COUNTERS WITHrecent form (2.2–-4.7), offensive rebounding (33.6–27.0), free throw rate (38.3–38.1).