
Creighton
15-18GAME THAT MATTERSAT
32.0%Creighton
68.0%UNLV
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUNLV -5.3
PROJECTED TOTAL157.0
MODEL MONEYLINEUNLV -212

UNLV
18-16MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreCreighton 76
Projected Total157.0
Projected ScoreUNLV 81
Team Comparison
50.6MMH Power Index52.8
109.0Offensive Efficiency111.0
109.5Defensive Efficiency109.6
-0.5Net Efficiency1.4
5.1Strength of Schedule2.7
-5.2Last 10 Net Efficiency1.1
68.9Tempo71.4
53.0%Effective FG%53.7%
16.6%Turnover Rate17.2%
26.6%Offensive Rebound %30.8%
29.0%Free Throw Rate41.6%
-0.3Average Margin1.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UNLV HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY68.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUNLV holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.8–50.6), offensive efficiency (111.0–109.0), net efficiency (1.4–-0.5), recent form (1.1–-5.2).
Creighton COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (109.5–109.6), strength of schedule (5.1–2.7), ball security (16.6–17.2).