UT Rio Grande Valley

19-14

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

18.6%UT Rio Grande Valley

81.4%Wisconsin

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADWisconsin -9.5

PROJECTED TOTAL154.6

MODEL MONEYLINEWisconsin -438

Wisconsin

24-11

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 73

Projected Total154.6

Projected ScoreWisconsin 82

Team Comparison

UT Rio Grande ValleyMetricWisconsin

55.8MMH Power Index64.5

112.6Offensive Efficiency118.6

103.1Defensive Efficiency108.8

9.5Net Efficiency9.8

-1.9Strength of Schedule6.7

12.3Last 10 Net Efficiency5.6

67.4Tempo69.9

55.7%Effective FG%54.6%

17.9%Turnover Rate12.8%

29.2%Offensive Rebound %28.7%

29.6%Free Throw Rate32.5%

6.4Average Margin6.9

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Wisconsin HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY81.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWisconsin holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.5–55.8), offensive efficiency (118.6–112.6), net efficiency (9.8–9.5), strength of schedule (6.7–-1.9).

UT Rio Grande Valley COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (103.1–108.8), recent form (12.3–5.6), shooting efficiency (55.7–54.6).

Final

UT Rio Grande Valley

84—87

Wisconsin

Wisconsin by 3 • 69.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UT Rio Grande ValleyTEAM STATWisconsin

31-63FG26-53

49.0%FG%49.0%

13-333PT8-20

39.0%3PT%40.0%

9-11FT27-32

82.0%FT%84.0%

27Rebounds32

7Offensive Rebounds9

12Assists10

10Turnovers9

7Steals5

1Blocks1

24Fouls16

Player Box Score

UT Rio Grande Valley

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Hasan Abdul Hakim	G	36	7-14	2-6	3-3	8	1	0	0	19
K.T. Raimey	Guard	24	3-8	3-6	4-4	2	1	2	0	13
Trey Miller	G	31	6-9	0-1	0-0	1	6	1	0	12
Cliff Davis	G	22	4-7	2-5	0-0	2	2	0	1	10
Howie Fleming Jr.	G	18	4-6	2-3	0-0	2	0	1	0	10
Tommy Gankhuyag	Forward	23	3-7	2-4	1-2	7	0	1	0	9
Kwo Agwa	F	8	2-3	1-2	1-1	2	0	0	0	6
DK Thorn	Guard	25	1-5	1-5	0-0	0	2	1	0	3
J.J. Howard	Guard	7	1-2	0-0	0-1	2	0	0	0	2
Marshal Destremau	F	6	0-2	0-1	0-0	1	0	1	0	0

Wisconsin

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
John Blackwell	G	38	11-18	2-5	6-8	7	3	0	0	30
John Tonje	Guard	31	3-5	3-5	10-10	3	0	1	0	19
Max Klesmit	Guard	34	3-11	1-6	4-4	1	2	0	1	11
Steve Crowl	Forward	21	3-7	0-0	3-4	5	1	0	0	9
Xavier Amos	F	13	3-6	1-2	2-2	3	1	1	0	9
Nolan Winter	F	12	2-3	0-0	2-2	3	1	0	0	6
Jack Janicki	G	10	1-1	1-1	0-0	0	0	1	0	3
Kamari McGee	Guard	21	0-2	0-1	0-0	1	2	1	0	0
Carter Gilmore	Forward	20	0-0	0-0	0-2	5	0	1	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

69.7Possessions69.7

120.5Offensive Efficiency124.8

124.8Defensive Efficiency120.5

-4.3Net Efficiency4.3

59.5%Effective FG%56.6%

61.6%True Shooting %63.8%

14.0%Turnover Rate13.2%

17.5%Free Throw Rate60.4%

52.4%3-Point Rate37.7%

1.20Assist / Turnover1.11

Game Summary

Wisconsin won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 69.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.