Arizona logo

Arizona

36-3
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
55.9%Arizona
44.1%Purdue
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADArizona -1.8
PROJECTED TOTAL157.1
MODEL MONEYLINEArizona -127
Purdue logo

Purdue

30-9
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreArizona 79
Projected Total157.1
Projected ScorePurdue 78

Team Comparison

79.9MMH Power Index73.2
120.3Offensive Efficiency124.8
96.9Defensive Efficiency107.8
23.4Net Efficiency17.0
8.0Strength of Schedule7.6
17.0Last 10 Net Efficiency11.8
71.6Tempo65.4
55.0%Effective FG%57.8%
15.1%Turnover Rate13.7%
37.8%Offensive Rebound %36.2%
45.3%Free Throw Rate29.1%
16.8Average Margin11.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Arizona HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY55.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMArizona holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (79.9–73.2), defensive efficiency (96.9–107.8), net efficiency (23.4–17.0), strength of schedule (8.0–7.6).
Purdue COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (124.8–120.3), shooting efficiency (57.8–55.0), ball security (13.7–15.1).
Final
Arizona logo
Arizona
84—92
Purdue logo
Purdue
Purdue by 8 • 76.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

ArizonaTEAM STATPurdue
32-62FG35-65
51.6%FG%53.8%
6-163PT10-24
37.5%3PT%41.7%
14-16FT12-19
87.5%FT%63.2%
26Rebounds32
5Offensive Rebounds11
24Assists22
13Turnovers13
8Steals10
1Blocks3
19Fouls14

Player Box Score

Arizona
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Caleb LoveGuard379-194-97-763210029
Keshad JohnsonForward298-132-26-782300024
Oumar BalloCenter336-90-01-263100013
Pelle LarssonGuard355-70-00-026000010
Kylan BoswellG273-90-40-01300006
Motiejus KrivasC61-20-00-01000002
KJ LewisG170-20-10-00500000
Jaden BradleyG160-10-00-02220000
Purdue
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Fletcher LoyerG3611-185-90-013400027
Braden SmithG369-154-74-442300026
Zach EdeyCenter368-150-06-995210022
Lance JonesGuard243-91-62-51402009
Trey Kaufman-RennF152-30-00-06200004
Mason GillisForward211-20-10-03310002
Caleb FurstForward81-20-10-02200002
Ethan MortonGuard130-10-00-13100000
Camden HeideF70-00-00-01000000
Myles ColvinG40-00-00-01000000

Advanced Game Stats

76.8Possessions76.8
109.4Offensive Efficiency119.8
119.8Defensive Efficiency109.4
-10.4Net Efficiency10.4
56.5%Effective FG%61.5%
60.3%True Shooting %62.1%
16.8%Turnover Rate17.1%
25.8%Free Throw Rate29.2%
25.8%3-Point Rate36.9%
1.85Assist / Turnover1.69
Game Summary
Purdue won by 8 points. The game played at approximately 76.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.