
Alabama
24-10GAME THAT MATTERSAT
83.2%Alabama
16.8%Creighton
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADAlabama -8.7
PROJECTED TOTAL167.0
MODEL MONEYLINEAlabama -495

Creighton
15-18MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreAlabama 88
Projected Total167.0
Projected ScoreCreighton 79
Team Comparison
69.5MMH Power Index50.6
121.6Offensive Efficiency109.0
111.2Defensive Efficiency109.5
10.4Net Efficiency-0.5
9.4Strength of Schedule5.1
9.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.2
74.7Tempo68.9
54.9%Effective FG%53.0%
13.0%Turnover Rate16.6%
32.1%Offensive Rebound %26.6%
36.9%Free Throw Rate29.0%
7.7Average Margin-0.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Alabama HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY83.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMAlabama holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (69.5–50.6), offensive efficiency (121.6–109.0), net efficiency (10.4–-0.5), strength of schedule (9.4–5.1).
Creighton COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (109.5–111.2).