UT Rio Grande Valley

19-14

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

84.4%UT Rio Grande Valley

15.6%Chicago State

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -11.3

PROJECTED TOTAL144.1

MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -541

Chicago State

7-25

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 78

Projected Total144.1

Projected ScoreChicago State 66

Team Comparison

UT Rio Grande ValleyMetricChicago State

55.8MMH Power Index36.1

112.6Offensive Efficiency99.4

103.1Defensive Efficiency114.9

9.5Net Efficiency-15.5

-1.9Strength of Schedule0.5

12.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.3

67.4Tempo66.2

55.7%Effective FG%45.6%

17.9%Turnover Rate15.8%

29.2%Offensive Rebound %29.1%

29.6%Free Throw Rate30.7%

6.4Average Margin-10.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY84.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.8–36.1), offensive efficiency (112.6–99.4), defensive efficiency (103.1–114.9), net efficiency (9.5–-15.5).

Chicago State COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.5–-1.9), ball security (15.8–17.9), free throw rate (30.7–29.6).

Final

UT Rio Grande Valley

68—78

Chicago State

Chicago State by 10 • 75.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UT Rio Grande ValleyTEAM STATChicago State

19-50FG26-60

38.0%FG%43.3%

3-173PT4-15

17.6%3PT%26.7%

27-33FT22-30

81.8%FT%73.3%

32Rebounds38

10Offensive Rebounds14

9Assists17

19Turnovers16

8Steals14

1Blocks4

21Fouls21

Player Box Score

UT Rio Grande Valley

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Elijah Elliott	G	37	3-16	1-6	10-13	5	2	2	0	17
Hasan Abdul Hakim	G	23	5-7	1-3	5-6	4	1	2	0	16
Daylen Williams	Forward	35	2-4	0-0	10-12	7	2	1	0	14
CJ Booker	PG	32	2-7	1-3	2-2	2	3	2	0	7
Ahren Freeman	Forward	10	3-3	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	0	6
J.J. Howard	Guard	19	1-3	0-1	0-0	1	1	0	0	2
Sherman Brashear	Guard	18	1-6	0-4	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Saliou Seye	F	13	1-3	0-0	0-0	3	0	0	1	2
Isaiah Barganier	F	9	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Roy Jones III	Guard	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	1	0	0

Chicago State

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Wesley Cardet Jr.	Guard	37	6-15	1-5	7-9	1	3	2	2	20
Noble Crawford	Forward	35	4-8	1-3	5-6	7	3	8	0	14
Brent Davis	Guard	31	3-9	1-3	4-4	4	2	2	0	11
Deshawn Jean-Charles	G	24	2-7	0-2	5-8	6	3	0	2	9
Jahsean Corbett	Guard	25	4-11	0-1	0-0	9	2	0	0	8
Tehshaundre Cole	F	9	4-5	0-0	0-1	3	0	0	0	8
A.J. Neal Jr.	G	15	3-3	1-1	0-0	2	0	1	0	7
Cameron Jernigan	Forward	11	0-2	0-0	1-2	2	0	0	0	1
Kedrick Green	Guard	9	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	4	1	0	0
Greg Spate	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Tristan Arneaud	Guard	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

75.5Possessions75.5

90.1Offensive Efficiency103.3

103.3Defensive Efficiency90.1

-13.2Net Efficiency13.2

41.0%Effective FG%46.7%

51.8%True Shooting %52.5%

25.4%Turnover Rate21.0%

66.0%Free Throw Rate50.0%

34.0%3-Point Rate25.0%

0.47Assist / Turnover1.06

Game Summary

Chicago State won by 10 points. The game played at approximately 75.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.