
Lipscomb
18-13GAME THAT MATTERSAT
9.2%Lipscomb
90.8%Kentucky
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADKentucky -14.7
PROJECTED TOTAL155.4
MODEL MONEYLINEKentucky -987

Kentucky
22-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLipscomb 70
Projected Total155.4
Projected ScoreKentucky 85
Team Comparison
47.9MMH Power Index63.9
111.3Offensive Efficiency115.2
107.6Defensive Efficiency106.3
3.7Net Efficiency8.9
-2.5Strength of Schedule8.7
-1.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.0
68.8Tempo69.9
54.8%Effective FG%53.2%
16.0%Turnover Rate15.4%
25.9%Offensive Rebound %33.2%
26.5%Free Throw Rate38.0%
2.5Average Margin6.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Kentucky HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY90.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMKentucky holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (63.9–47.9), offensive efficiency (115.2–111.3), defensive efficiency (106.3–107.6), net efficiency (8.9–3.7).
Lipscomb COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (54.8–53.2).