Queens University

21-14

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

19.4%Queens University

80.6%Clemson

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADClemson -11.0

PROJECTED TOTAL154.1

MODEL MONEYLINEClemson -415

Clemson

24-10

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreQueens University 72

Projected Total154.1

Projected ScoreClemson 83

Team Comparison

Queens UniversityMetricClemson

51.7MMH Power Index59.9

118.4Offensive Efficiency112.6

117.0Defensive Efficiency101.4

1.4Net Efficiency11.2

0.1Strength of Schedule4.6

1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7

71.4Tempo63.6

56.6%Effective FG%53.0%

14.8%Turnover Rate14.0%

29.6%Offensive Rebound %27.0%

37.6%Free Throw Rate38.1%

0.9Average Margin7.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Clemson HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY80.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–51.7), defensive efficiency (101.4–117.0), net efficiency (11.2–1.4), strength of schedule (4.6–0.1).

Queens University COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (118.4–112.6), recent form (1.5–-4.7), shooting efficiency (56.6–53.0).

Final

Queens University

79—109

Clemson

Clemson by 30 • 77.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Queens UniversityTEAM STATClemson

28-74FG43-68

37.8%FG%63.2%

14-423PT10-19

33.3%3PT%52.6%

9-13FT13-17

69.2%FT%76.5%

33Rebounds42

12Offensive Rebounds6

12Assists24

10Turnovers7

6Steals6

2Blocks6

15Fouls10

Player Box Score

Queens University

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
AJ McKee	Guard	30	6-17	3-11	3-3	2	1	1	0	18
BJ McLaurin	Forward	29	6-10	4-8	2-4	4	4	0	0	18
Chris Ashby	G	30	5-11	3-9	1-1	0	0	0	0	14
Deyton Albury	G	25	4-10	1-3	1-2	5	0	1	0	10
Logan Threatt	G	11	3-4	3-4	1-2	1	2	0	0	10
Bryce Cash	Guard	25	3-8	0-0	1-1	3	0	2	0	7
Jacobi Sebock	Guard	9	1-3	0-1	0-0	1	1	0	0	2
Jaxon Pollard	F	15	0-5	0-4	0-0	3	1	0	1	0
Kobe George	Guard	9	0-2	0-1	0-0	1	1	0	0	0
Kalib Mathews	Guard	8	0-1	0-0	0-0	2	1	2	0	0
Malcolm Wilson	Forward	7	0-2	0-0	0-0	4	1	0	1	0
Luke Krawczyk	F	2	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Clemson

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
PJ Hall	Center	19	11-13	2-2	3-3	4	1	1	4	27
Joseph Girard III	Guard	25	6-10	4-7	3-3	4	6	0	0	19
RJ Godfrey	F	24	8-9	0-0	3-4	4	2	0	0	19
Chauncey Wiggins	F	23	5-9	1-3	2-2	6	1	1	0	13
Chase Hunter	Guard	31	4-10	1-2	0-0	2	3	2	1	9
Joshua Beadle	G	23	3-3	1-1	1-3	2	3	1	0	8
Dillon Hunter	G	23	3-5	1-2	0-0	4	3	0	0	7
Ian Schieffelin	Forward	19	2-4	0-0	0-0	6	4	0	1	4
Andrew Latiff	Guard	2	1-2	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	2
Bas Leyte	Forward	5	0-1	0-0	1-2	0	1	0	0	1
Daniel Nauseef	Forward	4	0-1	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Matt Kelly	Guard	2	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

77.7Possessions77.7

101.7Offensive Efficiency140.3

140.3Defensive Efficiency101.7

-38.6Net Efficiency38.6

47.3%Effective FG%70.6%

49.3%True Shooting %71.6%

12.8%Turnover Rate9.1%

17.6%Free Throw Rate25.0%

56.8%3-Point Rate27.9%

1.20Assist / Turnover3.43

Game Summary

Clemson won by 30 points. The game played at approximately 77.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.