
Temple
16-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
60.0%Temple
40.0%Portland
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTemple -2.2
PROJECTED TOTAL150.6
MODEL MONEYLINETemple -150

Portland
15-19MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTemple 76
Projected Total150.6
Projected ScorePortland 74
Team Comparison
50.9MMH Power Index42.7
112.2Offensive Efficiency104.8
107.4Defensive Efficiency110.6
4.8Net Efficiency-5.8
-2.0Strength of Schedule1.8
-1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-8.1
65.9Tempo71.0
51.1%Effective FG%52.0%
13.7%Turnover Rate19.3%
28.8%Offensive Rebound %28.7%
42.3%Free Throw Rate36.9%
3.2Average Margin-4.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Temple HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY60.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTemple holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.9–42.7), offensive efficiency (112.2–104.8), defensive efficiency (107.4–110.6), net efficiency (4.8–-5.8).
Portland COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.8–-2.0), shooting efficiency (52.0–51.1).