Radford

16-16

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

13.6%Radford

86.4%Clemson

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADClemson -12.5

PROJECTED TOTAL149.6

MODEL MONEYLINEClemson -635

Clemson

24-10

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreRadford 69

Projected Total149.6

Projected ScoreClemson 81

Team Comparison

RadfordMetricClemson

47.9MMH Power Index59.9

110.9Offensive Efficiency112.6

107.4Defensive Efficiency101.4

3.5Net Efficiency11.2

-4.6Strength of Schedule4.6

2.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.7

73.4Tempo63.6

52.6%Effective FG%53.0%

17.0%Turnover Rate14.0%

31.4%Offensive Rebound %27.0%

41.0%Free Throw Rate38.1%

2.5Average Margin7.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Clemson HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY86.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMClemson holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.9–47.9), offensive efficiency (112.6–110.9), defensive efficiency (101.4–107.4), net efficiency (11.2–3.5).

Radford COUNTERS WITHrecent form (2.4–-4.7), offensive rebounding (31.4–27.0), free throw rate (41.0–38.1).

Final

Radford

58—93

Clemson

Clemson by 35 • 64.0 estimated possessions

Team Stats

RadfordTEAM STATClemson

22-53FG34-60

41.5%FG%56.7%

8-223PT11-29

36.4%3PT%37.9%

6-7FT14-14

85.7%FT%100.0%

13Rebounds45

2Offensive Rebounds15

8Assists14

9Turnovers13

7Steals7

4Blocks2

13Fouls6

Player Box Score

Radford

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kenyon Giles	G	31	7-13	2-4	1-2	1	4	0	0	17
Chandler Turner	Forward	32	4-11	1-3	2-2	4	1	0	0	11
Truth Harris	G	25	3-5	2-2	1-1	2	2	1	0	9
Bryan Antoine	Guard	25	2-6	1-3	2-2	0	0	2	0	7
DaQuan Smith	Guard	30	3-7	0-4	0-0	2	0	1	0	6
Trenton Walters	G	11	2-4	2-3	0-0	0	1	1	0	6
D'Auntray Pierce	Center	21	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	4	2
Kyle Burns	Guard	21	0-6	0-3	0-0	0	0	2	0	0
David Vidor	Forward	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Hunter Castleberry	Guard	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Clemson

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Joseph Girard III	Guard	27	8-11	4-7	4-4	4	3	0	0	24
PJ Hall	Center	23	6-11	2-5	3-3	3	1	2	1	17
Chase Hunter	Guard	28	5-8	2-5	4-4	2	5	2	0	16
RJ Godfrey	F	15	5-8	0-0	0-0	5	1	0	1	10
Chauncey Wiggins	F	23	4-8	0-3	0-0	5	0	0	0	8
Joshua Beadle	G	20	3-4	0-1	1-1	3	0	2	0	7
Ian Schieffelin	Forward	23	1-3	1-3	2-2	13	2	0	0	5
Dillon Hunter	G	25	1-5	1-3	0-0	3	2	1	0	3
Bas Leyte	Forward	8	1-1	1-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	3
Matt Kelly	Guard	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Daniel Nauseef	Forward	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0
Andrew Latiff	Guard	2	0-1	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

64.0Possessions64.0

90.6Offensive Efficiency145.3

145.3Defensive Efficiency90.6

-54.7Net Efficiency54.7

49.1%Effective FG%65.8%

51.5%True Shooting %69.8%

14.2%Turnover Rate20.1%

13.2%Free Throw Rate23.3%

41.5%3-Point Rate48.3%

0.89Assist / Turnover1.08

Game Summary

Clemson won by 35 points. The game played at approximately 64.0 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.