
Pennsylvania
18-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
4.4%Pennsylvania
95.6%Houston
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHouston -20.8
PROJECTED TOTAL145.8
MODEL MONEYLINEHouston -2173

Houston
29-7MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScorePennsylvania 62
Projected Total145.8
Projected ScoreHouston 83
Team Comparison
52.9MMH Power Index76
108.6Offensive Efficiency118.4
106.4Defensive Efficiency95.9
2.2Net Efficiency22.5
1.9Strength of Schedule5.9
2.3Last 10 Net Efficiency18.9
69.9Tempo65.2
50.9%Effective FG%52.3%
15.4%Turnover Rate12.9%
31.1%Offensive Rebound %35.3%
36.3%Free Throw Rate26.9%
1.5Average Margin14.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Houston HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY95.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHouston holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (76.0–52.9), offensive efficiency (118.4–108.6), defensive efficiency (95.9–106.4), net efficiency (22.5–2.2).
Pennsylvania COUNTERS WITHfree throw rate (36.3–26.9).