
Queens University
21-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
2.1%Queens University
97.9%Duke
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADDuke -26.3
PROJECTED TOTAL160.0
MODEL MONEYLINEDuke -4662

Duke
35-3MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQueens University 67
Projected Total160.0
Projected ScoreDuke 93
Team Comparison
51.7MMH Power Index81.7
118.4Offensive Efficiency122.2
117.0Defensive Efficiency95.2
1.4Net Efficiency27.0
0.1Strength of Schedule7.8
1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency18.7
71.4Tempo66.8
56.6%Effective FG%56.9%
14.8%Turnover Rate15.9%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %38.2%
37.6%Free Throw Rate39.0%
0.9Average Margin18.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Duke HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY97.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMDuke holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (81.7–51.7), offensive efficiency (122.2–118.4), defensive efficiency (95.2–117.0), net efficiency (27.0–1.4).
Queens University COUNTERS WITHball security (14.8–15.9).