
Merrimack
23-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
58.9%Merrimack
41.1%Rutgers
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMerrimack -2.2
PROJECTED TOTAL140.0
MODEL MONEYLINEMerrimack -143

Rutgers
13-20MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMerrimack 71
Projected Total140.0
Projected ScoreRutgers 69
Team Comparison
53.7MMH Power Index45.9
106.4Offensive Efficiency104.2
103.2Defensive Efficiency112.2
3.2Net Efficiency-8.0
0.7Strength of Schedule3.9
12.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.6
64.4Tempo67.4
49.3%Effective FG%47.4%
14.8%Turnover Rate15.0%
24.7%Offensive Rebound %29.2%
39.5%Free Throw Rate36.3%
2.1Average Margin-5.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Merrimack HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY58.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.7–45.9), offensive efficiency (106.4–104.2), defensive efficiency (103.2–112.2), net efficiency (3.2–-8.0).
Rutgers COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (3.9–0.7), offensive rebounding (29.2–24.7).